04-09-2017, 02:32 AM
Jim is still in denial that he made a mistake. Because Kamp, in no uncertain terms, placed Oswald on the Depository landing. Just because the excerpt doesn't mention that critical pronouncement, doesn't give Jim the right to proclaim that Kamp's essay "is about whether or not he was on the first floor eating his lunch as the motorcade went by." There is nothing impartial about that endorsement, and that point was very easily misconstrued. Albert confronted Jim about it and got suspended without explanation.
That injustice is why I started this thread. It isn't DiEugenio who is the victim in this situation. Moderator Lauren Johnson violated the site rules by punishing Doyle's correct objection to DiEugenio. Had a LNer made a similar endorsement, Jim would have pounced on it without mercy. As a professional academic he knows that if he promotes excerpts from an essay, he's promoting the contents of the entire essay.
As regards constructive input, my opening post in the thread Sean Murphy- Wrong Again!! (presently on p. 8 of the topics) details my effort to determine the height of PrayerMan. That photo-analysis is out in the open, right at my website, and the originals have been sent to the Sixth Floor Museum. That work helps constructively answer the question "Is PrayerMan Oswald?", not the question "How Can We Turn PrayerMan into Oswald?" An honest question is an open inquiry into finding out the truth, not a rigged investigation to conform to a pre-determined answer.
DiEugenio, like ROKC, continues calling for a better image- but any expert would tell you that Chris Davidson's metadata enhancement is that better image. It settles the issue, once and for all- we can see a woman's face on PrayerMan, and almost certainly this is Sarah Stanton. Yet Jim keeps ignoring the Davidson enhancement. And ignoring Doyle's height argument, and my own work refuting the lunchroom hoax. He pretends to be above the fray while tacitly siding with the Murphyites. And tells us he's the one getting censored and encircled with barbed wire.
Murphyism has become a flagrant politicization of objectively-determined truth.
That injustice is why I started this thread. It isn't DiEugenio who is the victim in this situation. Moderator Lauren Johnson violated the site rules by punishing Doyle's correct objection to DiEugenio. Had a LNer made a similar endorsement, Jim would have pounced on it without mercy. As a professional academic he knows that if he promotes excerpts from an essay, he's promoting the contents of the entire essay.
As regards constructive input, my opening post in the thread Sean Murphy- Wrong Again!! (presently on p. 8 of the topics) details my effort to determine the height of PrayerMan. That photo-analysis is out in the open, right at my website, and the originals have been sent to the Sixth Floor Museum. That work helps constructively answer the question "Is PrayerMan Oswald?", not the question "How Can We Turn PrayerMan into Oswald?" An honest question is an open inquiry into finding out the truth, not a rigged investigation to conform to a pre-determined answer.
DiEugenio, like ROKC, continues calling for a better image- but any expert would tell you that Chris Davidson's metadata enhancement is that better image. It settles the issue, once and for all- we can see a woman's face on PrayerMan, and almost certainly this is Sarah Stanton. Yet Jim keeps ignoring the Davidson enhancement. And ignoring Doyle's height argument, and my own work refuting the lunchroom hoax. He pretends to be above the fray while tacitly siding with the Murphyites. And tells us he's the one getting censored and encircled with barbed wire.
Murphyism has become a flagrant politicization of objectively-determined truth.