04-10-2017, 04:34 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-10-2017, 10:29 AM by Magda Hassan.)
Albert Doyle Wrote:Magda:
Tom Bowden has not offered one word of technical analysis on the issue. He hasn't addressed the Prayer Man evidence or the site rules that back our debunking of it. While Peter accuses us of being childish with our serious protest and analysis, the moderation then approves of a poster who mocks "water pistols at dawn" as his sole input to one of the most serious evidence issues in the JFK research community. This is entirely unfair and violates the Deep Politics site rules - only from the moderator side.
You are absolutely correct that I have not posted on this subject. I have chosen to ignore all the bickering because it would be a full time job to understand these posts. I do not live to post on these sites but read them to see if new things are worth considering. I research daily. I have my own opinion and research and believe it is not Oswald in the doorway. I was president and co-founder of the Conspiracy Museum and financed it entirely for its last six years. In my fourteen years at the Conspiracy Museum, I was subjected to listening to every theory under the universe by its visitors. Some had valid points but most had only read books and never talked to a single witness. I lived in Dallas from 1957 until 1963 and understand its politics and it homegrown criminals. I was acquainted with Candy Bar from 1958 until her death. She asked me to write her book after kicking out Schwartz and I declined. I have my own opinion on most of the topics discussed on these sites and have talked to most of the witnesses. I choose to be an observer and discuss my opinions and facts with other researchers in private.
Is it true, you do not post under your own name? Why?
Ahimsa….may you live in a world of non-forcefulness.