08-10-2017, 10:41 PM
My sincere thanks to the moderators for reinstating Albert Doyle's posting privileges. Forum life is never easy, and there are continual rough patches, but having the freedom to debate- the freedom to write something- is #1. Doyle has an astute mind and is a seasoned researcher who has a well-deserved place at the discussion table, particularly as another November approaches. It would be good if we could simply move forward now.
Our research careers have taken parallel tracks, so it is no sweat for me to step up and speak on his behalf. We've waged similar near-solitary campaigns as regards our specialties- PrayerMan and the lunchroom incident- and have been similarly reviled by the Murphyite mob. And I look at any hard feelings that may have been engendered by this particular thread as another episode in the Murphyite Wars. That Info-Battle has reached a critical mass, with 90+% of active posters, including Jim DiEugenio and Larry Hancock, endorsing the readily-disproven Murphy theories. These disproofs are some basic concepts which the research community doesn't process, and it has been a Herculean effort (3-4 years) to attempt to re-route such widespread regressive thinking.
One good thing about this particular thread- it has shown a light on the Murphyites' need for PrayerMan-is-Oswald in order to salvage any hope that the lunchroom hoax is tenable. These two beliefs depend on one another, in order for either one to be true.
The next step will shut the door forever on this Murphyite mullarkey. I am referring to a digital film scan, which I guarantee will show the face of a woman, and almost certainly she is Sarah Stanton.
I had a brief phone conversation with Robert Groden recently. I had hoped he had copies of Wiegman or Darnell, but was disappointed to learn that he only had the relatively poor-quality versions that were on the DVDs he made. But he gave me a solid lead on a place where I might find them. I contacted this source this past Friday afternoon and have not yet received a response. Hopefully I'll get lucky
and find out that this source still has possession of this film. Then it would be a straightforward problem of hiring a professional to do a digital scan and getting that right out onto the internet.
If that path dead-ends I'll look into some way to access the NBC vault films, a process which undoubtedly would take several months. With my money on the table and nuts on the line I have 100% confidence that PrayerMan is not Lee Harvey Oswald. The handwriting is on the wall that a digital film scan will be achieved. And the fate of the Murphyites will be like the fate of the Babylonians in the days of Daniel (5:27): "You have been weighed in the balances and found wanting."
Quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat
Those whom God wishes to destroy, He first drives mad
Our research careers have taken parallel tracks, so it is no sweat for me to step up and speak on his behalf. We've waged similar near-solitary campaigns as regards our specialties- PrayerMan and the lunchroom incident- and have been similarly reviled by the Murphyite mob. And I look at any hard feelings that may have been engendered by this particular thread as another episode in the Murphyite Wars. That Info-Battle has reached a critical mass, with 90+% of active posters, including Jim DiEugenio and Larry Hancock, endorsing the readily-disproven Murphy theories. These disproofs are some basic concepts which the research community doesn't process, and it has been a Herculean effort (3-4 years) to attempt to re-route such widespread regressive thinking.
One good thing about this particular thread- it has shown a light on the Murphyites' need for PrayerMan-is-Oswald in order to salvage any hope that the lunchroom hoax is tenable. These two beliefs depend on one another, in order for either one to be true.
The next step will shut the door forever on this Murphyite mullarkey. I am referring to a digital film scan, which I guarantee will show the face of a woman, and almost certainly she is Sarah Stanton.
I had a brief phone conversation with Robert Groden recently. I had hoped he had copies of Wiegman or Darnell, but was disappointed to learn that he only had the relatively poor-quality versions that were on the DVDs he made. But he gave me a solid lead on a place where I might find them. I contacted this source this past Friday afternoon and have not yet received a response. Hopefully I'll get lucky
and find out that this source still has possession of this film. Then it would be a straightforward problem of hiring a professional to do a digital scan and getting that right out onto the internet.
If that path dead-ends I'll look into some way to access the NBC vault films, a process which undoubtedly would take several months. With my money on the table and nuts on the line I have 100% confidence that PrayerMan is not Lee Harvey Oswald. The handwriting is on the wall that a digital film scan will be achieved. And the fate of the Murphyites will be like the fate of the Babylonians in the days of Daniel (5:27): "You have been weighed in the balances and found wanting."
Quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat
Those whom God wishes to destroy, He first drives mad