19-04-2018, 09:06 PM
Why does almost everyone in the media (and others) try to jam the FBI into a partisan political mold? They obviously are not interested in PARTISAN politics. In the 2016 election, neither Hilary nor Trump appealed to the FBI or the National Security State. They obviously wanted Jeb Bush and Ted Cruz who had CIA connections. They probably have a plan to replace both Trump and Pence in the current faux Watergate activitiy.
It is a big mistake for Trump supporters to claim that the FBI favored Hilary. The Hilary supporters had ample evidence they did not favor her.
I don't think people are that much in the dark. Trying to pin a partisan label or make a partisan analysis of the actions of the FBI by saying "he was appointed by Obama" or "she was appointed by Bush" is an obvious diversion from the real situation.
The FBI is not politically partisan any more than is the CIA or the military. They want a person in the White House who will participate in a crime spree (which the Bush-Cheney administration was) and help the National Security State sponsor things like the 9-11 and anthrax attacks and the Iraq War.
People who know the true score should be tough on those who try to make a Political Party analysis to distract from the real National Security State analysis. As I have said, Hitler managed to lay waste to Germany and Europe in only 12 years. George W. Bush laid waste to the US economy and half of the Middle East in 8 years.
Do we want to hand the keys back to the National Security State by jumping on the Comey, McCabe, Mueller bandwagon? People who favor this are out to get our country in a very negative way and are hazardous anti-patriots, in my opinion.
James Lateer
It is a big mistake for Trump supporters to claim that the FBI favored Hilary. The Hilary supporters had ample evidence they did not favor her.
I don't think people are that much in the dark. Trying to pin a partisan label or make a partisan analysis of the actions of the FBI by saying "he was appointed by Obama" or "she was appointed by Bush" is an obvious diversion from the real situation.
The FBI is not politically partisan any more than is the CIA or the military. They want a person in the White House who will participate in a crime spree (which the Bush-Cheney administration was) and help the National Security State sponsor things like the 9-11 and anthrax attacks and the Iraq War.
People who know the true score should be tough on those who try to make a Political Party analysis to distract from the real National Security State analysis. As I have said, Hitler managed to lay waste to Germany and Europe in only 12 years. George W. Bush laid waste to the US economy and half of the Middle East in 8 years.
Do we want to hand the keys back to the National Security State by jumping on the Comey, McCabe, Mueller bandwagon? People who favor this are out to get our country in a very negative way and are hazardous anti-patriots, in my opinion.
James Lateer