03-05-2018, 12:09 AM
What David is saying about the REA shipment is correct.
This is a key point that the first generation of researchers largely missed. The delivery of firearms to Oswald is highly questionable.
To my knowledge, John Armstrong was the first person to delve into the lack of documentation for the Smith and Wesson 38 Victory modification. And its the complete lack of documentation for the transaction that leaves the whole issue of evidence modification with the handgun a distinct possibility.
Not only is there no evidence that Oswald ever picked up that revolver, but I have never been able to find any evidence that the FBI ever went to REA. If that is true it is really something.
If Joe still frequents this forum, maybe he can refer us to the part of his book where he deals with this issue.
This is a key point that the first generation of researchers largely missed. The delivery of firearms to Oswald is highly questionable.
To my knowledge, John Armstrong was the first person to delve into the lack of documentation for the Smith and Wesson 38 Victory modification. And its the complete lack of documentation for the transaction that leaves the whole issue of evidence modification with the handgun a distinct possibility.
Not only is there no evidence that Oswald ever picked up that revolver, but I have never been able to find any evidence that the FBI ever went to REA. If that is true it is really something.
If Joe still frequents this forum, maybe he can refer us to the part of his book where he deals with this issue.