29-07-2018, 09:42 PM
Thanks to the above postings for trying to "bail me out" for my criticisms of the Kennedy Dynasty. I have been accused of "libeling" the Kennedys and presenting "scurrilous information" about the Kennedys.
But here's the problem. If things began to go badly for our country on 11-22-63, then what is the problem that we have because of that? THE PROBLEM IS THAT OUR GOVERNMENT NOW LIES TO US! WE ARE STILL DROWNING IN LIES!
So what is to be accomplished by you and me lying about dead presidents? Arguably both JFK and Bill Clinton were or are sexually depraved (and Anthony Wiener, too). What is to be gained by sweeping this under the rug? One can ask, how can we avoid this depravity in picking future presidents? That seems to me to be a perfectly respectable question to be asking. If it's a problem, then it has to be discussed and not "hushed up." And it's not libel to be asking it.
It is significant that Mr. Ralph Ganis in "The Skorzeny Papers" claims that the motive for the JFK assassination was JUST THAT! He claims that JFK's scandalous behavior was the motive for the assassination! But then, I'm a libel artist or a purveyor of "scurrilous information" if I try to just put it on the table where it belongs!
The whole purpose of JFK assassination research is, to me, to tell the truth about the JFK assassination. There were those who thought (and think) the best thing for the country is to blame Oswald.
Sorry, those who want to blame Oswald do not have the best interests of the USA at heart. They mean well, maybe, but they are simply misguided.
The most noteworthy thing about Henry VIII was that he had 8 wives and murdered most or all of them. You can't claim to be an expert on Henry VIII and claim that he was only married once. Sorry.
Despite all the uniquely ingenious innovations of the JFK administration and all of the brilliance and idealism he brought to the White House, it makes no sense to me for anyone to be worried about LIBELING JFK!
Like the eight wives of Henry VIII, perhaps the most noteworthy facts about the Kennedy dynasty was that JPK, JFK and possibly RFK (not sure) were amoral to an extreme in their personal lives and that the younger generation indulged in a (arguably) ridiculous amount of risk-taking behavior. Call it accident-prone. Call it risk-taking. Call it self-destructive. Call it extremely foolish. If you don't like my phrase "death wish" then what would you call it?
Whatever you call it, it led to Dallas, it lead to the Ambassador Hotel, it led to Chappaquidick, it led to all kinds of stuff, none of it good.
But some who are recognized experts on these things and who have more experience than I have, want to ignore the obvious and sweep any and all things under the rug as it might suit them.
This is the essence of tragedy. The flaws of the hero bring him down in the end. And it's not libel or scurrilous to tell the true tale of the tragic life of JFK.
James Lateer
But here's the problem. If things began to go badly for our country on 11-22-63, then what is the problem that we have because of that? THE PROBLEM IS THAT OUR GOVERNMENT NOW LIES TO US! WE ARE STILL DROWNING IN LIES!
So what is to be accomplished by you and me lying about dead presidents? Arguably both JFK and Bill Clinton were or are sexually depraved (and Anthony Wiener, too). What is to be gained by sweeping this under the rug? One can ask, how can we avoid this depravity in picking future presidents? That seems to me to be a perfectly respectable question to be asking. If it's a problem, then it has to be discussed and not "hushed up." And it's not libel to be asking it.
It is significant that Mr. Ralph Ganis in "The Skorzeny Papers" claims that the motive for the JFK assassination was JUST THAT! He claims that JFK's scandalous behavior was the motive for the assassination! But then, I'm a libel artist or a purveyor of "scurrilous information" if I try to just put it on the table where it belongs!
The whole purpose of JFK assassination research is, to me, to tell the truth about the JFK assassination. There were those who thought (and think) the best thing for the country is to blame Oswald.
Sorry, those who want to blame Oswald do not have the best interests of the USA at heart. They mean well, maybe, but they are simply misguided.
The most noteworthy thing about Henry VIII was that he had 8 wives and murdered most or all of them. You can't claim to be an expert on Henry VIII and claim that he was only married once. Sorry.
Despite all the uniquely ingenious innovations of the JFK administration and all of the brilliance and idealism he brought to the White House, it makes no sense to me for anyone to be worried about LIBELING JFK!
Like the eight wives of Henry VIII, perhaps the most noteworthy facts about the Kennedy dynasty was that JPK, JFK and possibly RFK (not sure) were amoral to an extreme in their personal lives and that the younger generation indulged in a (arguably) ridiculous amount of risk-taking behavior. Call it accident-prone. Call it risk-taking. Call it self-destructive. Call it extremely foolish. If you don't like my phrase "death wish" then what would you call it?
Whatever you call it, it led to Dallas, it lead to the Ambassador Hotel, it led to Chappaquidick, it led to all kinds of stuff, none of it good.
But some who are recognized experts on these things and who have more experience than I have, want to ignore the obvious and sweep any and all things under the rug as it might suit them.
This is the essence of tragedy. The flaws of the hero bring him down in the end. And it's not libel or scurrilous to tell the true tale of the tragic life of JFK.
James Lateer