09-08-2018, 10:55 PM
Mr. Kowalski--Please keep us informed about this. When you say that the papers have no evidence of wrongdoing, how do you know that? Have you reviewed the papers or have any representatives of the heirs reviewed the papers? Just curious.
If the court appoints a person to review the papers, will the court instruct the appointee as to the standards to use to decide what is subject to the privilege? As the plaintiff, will you be asked by the court to provide standards or agree on the definition of privilege?
Since Mr. Bloomfield did so much work for International Organizations regarding matters of international law (such as the UN) would the U.N. be considered a client? Or would any of the organizations with which he worked be considered clients? I am thinking about such groups as the Sonneborn group of which he was a member? Is the Archive opposing the release or is the archive favoring the release? If the archive wants a cover-up, then it's not much of an archive!
If these papers are released, there is undoubtedly a lot we will learn. Thanks for this effort.
James Lateer
If the court appoints a person to review the papers, will the court instruct the appointee as to the standards to use to decide what is subject to the privilege? As the plaintiff, will you be asked by the court to provide standards or agree on the definition of privilege?
Since Mr. Bloomfield did so much work for International Organizations regarding matters of international law (such as the UN) would the U.N. be considered a client? Or would any of the organizations with which he worked be considered clients? I am thinking about such groups as the Sonneborn group of which he was a member? Is the Archive opposing the release or is the archive favoring the release? If the archive wants a cover-up, then it's not much of an archive!
If these papers are released, there is undoubtedly a lot we will learn. Thanks for this effort.
James Lateer