Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
CIA and the National Archives Thwart The JFK Act
#1
CIA and the National Archives Thwart The JFK Act and Obstruct Democratic Accountability
By Jim Lesar


All records related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy ("JFK") are already supposed to be public. That's what Congress intended when it unanimously passed the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 ("JFK Act"). It hasn't happened. The National Archives and the CIA are still withholding thousands of pages of JFK Act records in their entirety, even though it has been more than a half century since the Warren Commission issued its Report on the murder of the President. NARA's actions violate the law and its intent, and severely erode the principle of democratic accountability, on which America's government is based. This violation directly raises the issue of who writes the law, who rules in the United States: the elected representatives of the people in Congress or the intelligence agencies?

Over 1,100 CIA files dealing with the John F. Kennedy assassination remain classified in apparent defiance of the JFK Records Act which requires them to be speedily reviewed and made public.
(image by Wikipedia (commons.wikimedia.org))

The Assassination Archives and Research Center ("AARC"), a nonprofit organization dedicated to obtaining, preserving and disseminating information on political assassinations, is holding a conference on the 50th anniversary of the Kennedy assassination this September 26-28th, at the Bethesda Hyatt Regency Hotel. Entitled "The Warren Report and the JFK Assassination: Five Decades of Significant Disclosures," the conference will show that a large number of significant disclosures have been made over the decades since the Report was issued and have severely wounded its credibility. Its conclusion is now a myth. There was no single rifle, and there was no lone assassin. There were multiple shots from multiple locations fired by multiple assassins.

But the demise of the Warren Report still leaves us without the full truth that we are entitled to because important information about JFK's murder continues to be withheld. In the wake of the huge outpouring of public opinion caused by Oliver Stone's movie "JFK," Congress unanimously passed the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 (JFK Act). It directed that Government agencies would promptly disclose to the American people all the records and information needed for the public to determine the truth about the assassination. That mandate has not been implemented. Rather, the CIA and the National Archives continue to withhold thousands of pages of documents in their entirety -- despite this intent. Such records must be released as promptly as circumstances permit.

Instead, NARA, deferring to the CIA, continues to refuse to release these records until 2017 -- if then. The present circumstances clearly warrant immediate release. This is an egregious violation of the JFK Act and the unanimous intent of Congress.

These records are, almost without exception, more than 50 years old. Under President Obama's new executive order on national security classification, E.O.13526, nearly all information more than 50 years old is subject to automatic declassification and must be released. Yet the CIA and NARA continue to insist that these materials should continue to be withheld. I invited the National Archivist, Mr. David Ferreiro, to address this policy at our conference on the Warren Report. He did not respond directly, but conveyed his decision to decline the invitation through a phone call to me by NARA's legal counsel Gary Stern.

The NARA/CIA refusal to obey the law is egregious. The JFK Act was passed unanimously to get Kennedy assassination information to the public in a timely fashion, so the people could assess the controversies over JFK's death. The 50th anniversary is the perfect opportunity for NARA and the CIA to produce these withheld records and to stop violations of the JFK Act. Instead, NARA has reneged on its previous commitment to make these records available by the end of 2013.



This is not simply a matter of academic interest. There are other implications that flow from the conduct of NARA and CIA.

Many startling revelations bearing on the Kennedy assassination controversy have been unearthed in the 50 years since the Warren Report was issued. Allen Dulles sat on the Warren Commission, and was its most active member, despite the odd circumstance that Kennedy forced him out of his CIA office as Director of CIA after the Bay of Pigs disaster. Years after the Report was issued, it was learned that Dulles was privy to the CIA/Mafia plots to assassinate President Fidel Castro, but failed to mention this obviously relevant circumstance to his fellow commissioners. A more recent jaw-dropping disclosure is that the integrity of the last official investigation into President Kennedy's murder, that conducted by the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA), was compromised by the CIA, when it assigned as liason to the House Select Committee on Assassinations, a retired official named George Joannides, while withholding information about his background which suggestsd that he should instead have been a focus of their investigation. Federal Judge and former chair of the Assassination Records Review Board, John R. Tunheim, has accused the CIA of "treachery" in its handling of the Joannides matter and suggests that "if [the CIA] fooled us on that, they may have fooled us on other things," while calling on the CIA to release those and implicitly all other files that "clearly have become relevant to the assassination,"

Ironically, the JFK Act was passed to remedy the failure of the Freedom of Information Act to provide for meaningful access to Kennedy assassination records. Now assassination researchers are compelled once again to resort to FOIA - which Congress sought to eliminate with its JFK Act legislation - by providing a more efficacious, prompt, and less costly remedy.

It is time, now, for NARA to fulfill its mission as library for the United States of America. According to its charter, it is not an appendage to the CIA. It is obligated as an independent agency to give its professional judgment and advice to the White House. NARA's mission statement reads:

"We drive openness, cultivate public participation, and strengthen our nation's democracy through public access to high-value government records.

"Our Mission is to provide public access to Federal Government records in our custody and control. Public access to government records strengthens democracy by allowing Americans to claim their rights of citizenship, hold their government accountable, and understand their history so they can participate more effectively in their government."

When the records of greatest interest to the public are the JFK Act records it is withholding, NARA has not complied with its Mission Statement.

James Lesar,

President, AARC
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Reply
#2

November 1, 2014

Dear AOTUS



Dear Mr. Kelly


Thank you for your recent e-mail raising your concerns about the sufficiency of the JFK Assassination Records Collection database that is available on archives.gov at the following url: http://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/seach.html


The Archivist forwarded your e-mail to be for direct reply to you.


As I'm sure you know, the JFK database was created in response to the JFK Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992. In section 5(d) of the Act NARA was required to create "a uniform system of electronic records" comprising identification aids created for each record transmitted to the Archivist. The Act did not stipulate what data fields should be included on the identification aid.


NARA met the obligations of the Act when it created a uniform system and made it available to the agencies that were transmitting the assassination related document to the NARA for inclusion in the Collection. The originating agencies entered the data fields for each document prior to transfer and transferred the data at the same time the records were accessioned by NARA. NARA then entered the data into the JFK Master System and has maintained that system, as well as the public use version on archives.gov since that time.
Accordingly, we believe that NARA has fully complied with the requirements of the Act.
NARA has freely acknowledged, however, that the "current status" field is out of date, and we realized that this frustrates you and other researchers.


The Special Access and FOIA unit that is responsible for the constitution of the Collection and maintenance of the database has extensive responsibilities for records outside of the Collection. Updates have unfortunately been delayed due to other FOIA review and access policy demands on their limited resources.


I am pleased to inform you that the Special Access and FOIA unit has consulted a team to process all of the JFK documents that are being withheld for release by 2017 in accordance with the JFK Act (the only basis to withhold records beyond that time would be if the President personally certifies continued postponement, under section 5(g)(2)(D) of the JFK Act).


As part of that process, the team is currently updating the JFK Collection Master System.


We then intend to update the public use version once the data has been corrected, although we do not expect the update to be complete until 2017.


We welcome any additional input you would like to provide us about deficiencies in the database, so that we can be sure to correct them.


Sincerely,
Martha Wagner Murphy

Chief, Special Access and FOIA Staff
National Archives at College Park


BILL KELLY RESPONDS:


Dear Martha Murphy,


Thank you for inviting me and other researchers to provide additional input on the deficiencies in the JFK Collection database as well as the opportunity to comment on matters of NARA policies and procedures regarding the JFK Act.


A number of speakers commented on the data base t a recent conference in Washington D.C. on the 50[SUP]th[/SUP]anniversary of the release of the Warren Report, one saying it just "didn't work" and another saying it is "basically useless," so your acknowledgement that the "current status" of the database frustrates researchers is an understatement.


The idea that the CIA could accelerate the release of thousands of documents in 2003 that were due for release in 2010 proves that such acceleration is possible and there's no excuse why the remaining sealed JFK Assassination records can't be processed by the 2013 National Declassification Review system already in place. It's also hard to imagine how hard it would be to update the Master System and the public access database at that time.


Beyond the basic frustration of an un-useable public database, we have found that Secret Service records reportedly destroyed have folders that are marked "withheld," and that some thought destroyed have been located among the private papers of former agents (Blaine), while other government assassination records have been located among the private papers of former chief counsel Richard Sprague, Esq. and former WC attorney Howard Willins, and there appears to be little attempt to acquire these records for inclusion the JFK Collection as required by the law. Why aren't the JFK Assassination records in the hands of former government employees being pursued, acquired and included in the collection? I believe Blaine and other Secret Service agents have more records and I suspect so does DOD historian Dr. Alfred Goldberg.


Why can't you scan and post on line the most frequently requested documents rather than continuing to manually respond to the same requests over and over?


Why can't you tell us how many documents are still being withheld, but you can't even though Congress required the Review Board to publish a list of such records in the Federal Register?


Why can't you provide a printout of all 1,100 CIA NBR records that are postponed until 2017?


Why can't you remove the remaining redactions in the records previously released?


Why can't you tell us the number of assassination records that have been destroyed and are missing?


It is frustrating to have NARA say "We cannot confirm any ONI records are in fact missing from the collection," when we know of many that aren't in the collection now, and we know how determined ONI was to exclude all of its assassination records from the collection. You must acknowledge they are missing before you even start to look for them.


It would be good for the NARA JFK Collection staff to meet with or continue a dialog with a focus group of researchers that we have informally formed so we can continue to advise you as we get closer to 2017.


Giving select researchers access to the Master System directory would help, especially those researchers who are compiling lists of records withheld, destroyed and missing, as well as those who are creating a guide and index to the collection, something that Congress and the JFK Act requires the Archivist to do:
Final Report ARRB p. 184-5 - Section 4: President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection at the National Archives and Records Administration. (a) In General (1)….The Collection shall consist of record copies of all Government records relating to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, which shall be transmitted to the National Archives in accordance with section 2107 of title 44, United States Code. The Archivist shall prepare and publish a subject guidebook and index to the collection…."


It doesn't say anything about an unuseable searchable data base or Master System that the public can't have access to. So here we are decades after Congress passed this law and there is still no prepared and published subject guidebook and index, something that researchers themselves are apparently going to have to do.


Besides preparing our own guidebook and index, and continuing the on-going dialogs between the NARA staff and researchers, the only thing we can do is to file FOIA requests and appeals and ask Congress to conduct its required oversight of the JFK Act hold hearings and obtain the testimony of those responsible for the implementing the law and destroying and wrongfully withholding records.


Why hasn't NARA requested Congress to oversee the JFK Act and enforce the law despite the reticence of almost all of the government agencies who waited out the ARRB?


Final Report "Section 4: (e) Oversight The Committee on Government Operations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Governmental Affairs of the Senate shall have continuing oversight jurisdiction with respect to the collection."


Why aren't these committees doing their job and overseeing the enforcement of the JFK Act, which according to the law, "…continue in effect until such time as the Archivist certifies to the President and Congress that all assassination records have been made available to the public in accordance with this Act."
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Reply
#3
Good work Bill! Hopefully there are a few others also giving them their feedback.

Love this piece of disingenuous dodging here:

Quote:The Act did not stipulate what data fields should be included on the identification aid.

Well they didn't stipulate what should be excluded either so

[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=6400&stc=1]


Attached Files
.jpg   download-all-the-things.jpg (Size: 25 KB / Downloads: 17)
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx

"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.

“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Reply
#4
Quote:The Act did not stipulate what data fields should be included on the identification aid.




That jumped out at me too. It is like saying, yes, we were told to build the supermarket but nowhere did it say we had to stock it with food. This is the bare shelf form of democracy. Quite arrogant, quite contemptuous. A hedge row strategy of compartmentalization and bureaucratic resistance.
Reply
#5
A bit like a major report into an assassination that was published with no index?
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Library and Archives Canada Lawsuit John Kowalski 32 57,729 10-01-2019, 04:51 PM
Last Post: John Kowalski
  National Archives releases first batch of 2017 JFK documents Anthony Thorne 154 168,029 10-08-2018, 07:51 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  National Archives releases some October 2017 documents, withholds others Anthony Thorne 3 4,801 27-10-2017, 10:13 AM
Last Post: Martin White
  "killing kennedy" documentary to be produced by national geographic channel Mark Prior 6 6,587 28-11-2016, 05:25 PM
Last Post: Tracy Riddle
  National Archives Decides to Withhold JFK Assassination Records Instead of Declassifying Them Adele Edisen 50 20,989 05-02-2016, 06:05 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Breaking News: The National Examiner cracks the case! 5/2/14 Drew Phipps 5 3,308 03-05-2014, 04:06 PM
Last Post: Dawn Meredith
  Guardians of the National Mythos - James Tracy Tracy Riddle 1 1,997 29-04-2014, 01:32 AM
Last Post: Drew Phipps
  National Geographic Chl: JFK: The Final Hours - Clint Hill exposes Anthony DeFiore 0 2,238 09-11-2013, 04:21 PM
Last Post: Anthony DeFiore
  Protest at the National Archives Bill Kelly 6 3,428 18-10-2012, 01:31 AM
Last Post: Adele Edisen
  National Archives and JFK Documents Adele Edisen 3 2,571 01-10-2012, 09:12 AM
Last Post: A.J. Blocker

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)