23-06-2019, 03:59 AM
What?????
H P Apparently felt that delays in the publishing world are to be expected. But he felt, I think, that this book was particularly difficult because of legal vetting. That has to imply that this book was getting closer to "legal boundaries" that his previous work.
As Mr. Thorne has mentioned, if it was being legally vetted, then it must have had a proposed final form. Since the delays were at least from November 2017 to November 2019, that just doesn't add up logically. If the legal hassles were that serious, then just take out the offending sentences or paragraphs.
In 550 pages of my book The Three Barons, there was absolutely no discussion about any potential legal problems, libel, slander, official secrets, invasion of privacy, etc. NO DISCUSSION. Nor have I heard of any problems. All the people of 11-22-63 are pretty much gone. So what does that say about Hank's Coup In Dallas--delayed for two years because of legal concerns?
You also have to toss in the fact the the two original authors "split up" and each did their own book. The Ganis book, The Skorzeny Papers, didn't seem (to me) to invade any new, legally sensitive area. As I best recall from "Skorzeny", most or all of the persons mentioned were deceased or would have been deceased based on the time period on which Ganis reported.
So you have the picture of Hank submitting a finished or complete manuscript to the legal department of Skyhorse, then having the authors split up the subject matter and go their own two ways, AND THEN HAVE AN ADDITIONAL DELAY OF A YEAR OR YEAR AND A HALF, ostensibly with issues involving "important people" who were apparently problematic.
I can say that I personally provided Hank with a lead relating to Richard Bissell, and Hank seemed eager to pursue that lead. And (I guess), Richard Bissell is (or was) the uncle of Robert Mueller. That type of thing could obviously bother the faint-of-heart.
The real nitty-gritty of this puzzling tale is this: some well regarded researcher like say, Jim Marrs, Peter Dale Scott or Dick Russell should ask Skyhorse Publishing the following---"If I came into possession of the Albarelli manuscript, would Skyhorse release me to publish the manuscript or something very much like it?" Just yes or no.
Since there are apparently copies floating around, that might actually be possible. The book sure has had some good advance publicity.
Of course, Mr. Ralph Ganis would know the inside story of the problems with the Albarelli book. And the very fact that it was on the desk of the legal department for (maybe) two years speaks volumes about whether the book was hitting on the truth. THE UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH FOR (AT LEAST) SOMEBODY OR SOME PEOPLE.
The plot seems to have thickened. Maybe some more will be heard. But our curiosity is now heightened for sure.
James Lateer
H P Apparently felt that delays in the publishing world are to be expected. But he felt, I think, that this book was particularly difficult because of legal vetting. That has to imply that this book was getting closer to "legal boundaries" that his previous work.
As Mr. Thorne has mentioned, if it was being legally vetted, then it must have had a proposed final form. Since the delays were at least from November 2017 to November 2019, that just doesn't add up logically. If the legal hassles were that serious, then just take out the offending sentences or paragraphs.
In 550 pages of my book The Three Barons, there was absolutely no discussion about any potential legal problems, libel, slander, official secrets, invasion of privacy, etc. NO DISCUSSION. Nor have I heard of any problems. All the people of 11-22-63 are pretty much gone. So what does that say about Hank's Coup In Dallas--delayed for two years because of legal concerns?
You also have to toss in the fact the the two original authors "split up" and each did their own book. The Ganis book, The Skorzeny Papers, didn't seem (to me) to invade any new, legally sensitive area. As I best recall from "Skorzeny", most or all of the persons mentioned were deceased or would have been deceased based on the time period on which Ganis reported.
So you have the picture of Hank submitting a finished or complete manuscript to the legal department of Skyhorse, then having the authors split up the subject matter and go their own two ways, AND THEN HAVE AN ADDITIONAL DELAY OF A YEAR OR YEAR AND A HALF, ostensibly with issues involving "important people" who were apparently problematic.
I can say that I personally provided Hank with a lead relating to Richard Bissell, and Hank seemed eager to pursue that lead. And (I guess), Richard Bissell is (or was) the uncle of Robert Mueller. That type of thing could obviously bother the faint-of-heart.
The real nitty-gritty of this puzzling tale is this: some well regarded researcher like say, Jim Marrs, Peter Dale Scott or Dick Russell should ask Skyhorse Publishing the following---"If I came into possession of the Albarelli manuscript, would Skyhorse release me to publish the manuscript or something very much like it?" Just yes or no.
Since there are apparently copies floating around, that might actually be possible. The book sure has had some good advance publicity.
Of course, Mr. Ralph Ganis would know the inside story of the problems with the Albarelli book. And the very fact that it was on the desk of the legal department for (maybe) two years speaks volumes about whether the book was hitting on the truth. THE UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH FOR (AT LEAST) SOMEBODY OR SOME PEOPLE.
The plot seems to have thickened. Maybe some more will be heard. But our curiosity is now heightened for sure.
James Lateer