28-01-2010, 07:43 AM
I was very patient with Eaglesham when this exchange began. I rebutted his every move. Yet he disregarded response after response. He has ignored the evidence from scratch. You may regard this a commendable, but I do not. I cannot imagine why you would not take to task--ever so politely, as you may--someone who is obfuscating and obscuring obvious evidence. My regard for JFK is such that I simply cannot abide those who continue to betray the search for truth. You apparently have a more tolerant attitude toward those who promote false beliefs about the assassination than do I. Why did you not observe that he was wrong? I was very patient in the beginning. Then it became obvious that he wasn't going to budge. That is inexcusable and I am not going to view it kindly. This is a moral issue, not a question of logic. Anyone can assess the weight of the evidence. Not anyone is going to continue to promote rubbish to deceive the public about such things.