01-02-2010, 08:26 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-02-2010, 11:38 PM by Charles Drago.)
Elsewhere on the JFK page of this forum, the assassinations of John and Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. have been described as "unsolved Civil Rights murder cases from the 1960's."
We might benefit from arguments raised for and against this proposition as it relates to the murder of JFK.
Is it wholly on-target?
Does it point the finger at all, some, or none of the true Sponsors of the hit?
(My working definition of "Sponsors" in this case is the at-the-top powers who ordered the murder and cover-up -- as opposed to their Facilitators and Mechanics.)
Does it bring to light the nature of the act, its essence?
If the proposition is judged to be wholly or even significantly off-target, are we in a position to know if we are being misinformed (as the result of an honest, well-intentioned error)? Disinformed (as targets of a hostile act)?
We might benefit from arguments raised for and against this proposition as it relates to the murder of JFK.
Is it wholly on-target?
Does it point the finger at all, some, or none of the true Sponsors of the hit?
(My working definition of "Sponsors" in this case is the at-the-top powers who ordered the murder and cover-up -- as opposed to their Facilitators and Mechanics.)
Does it bring to light the nature of the act, its essence?
If the proposition is judged to be wholly or even significantly off-target, are we in a position to know if we are being misinformed (as the result of an honest, well-intentioned error)? Disinformed (as targets of a hostile act)?