Is the Assassination of JFK an "unsolved Civil Rights murder case from the 1960s"?

[John Bevilaqua]

On a simple human level, this is tragic.

This ego thing just gets worse...Tragic is not the word that springs to my mind. From the above post I sincerely doubt that JB has actually read JFKU.

No"orginal research?" Your opinions are simply that, opinions not grounded in the slightest bit of fact.

Now I shall go back to not reading them. I am not tryng to be insulting but
your put downs are staggering to me. Only you have the answers, eh?

Talk among yourselves.

Dawn

What is really tragic is that Drago thinks that his primitive arm twisting Gestapo Tactics and McCarthyism Tactics: "Comply With My Theories and Post Only Supportive non-Argumentative Themes or Be Gone" will work on anyone. Methinks he may be more than just a little bit jealous that people like Civil Rights Cold Case specialist Susan Kloepfer, Pulitzer Prize winner Doug Blackmon, Dr. Jerry Rose, Bill Turner, Mary Ferrell, Carl Oglesby and now Hank Albarelli, Jr. find my arguments very compelling, quite original and very convincing and they go out of their way to compliment me and encourage me while they are not the least bit curious about any of his warmed over right wing rhetoric which smacks of typical John Birch style pablum. Both Jerry Rose and Gordon Winslow confirmed all the verifiable details of my personal Miami experiences right down to the identification of my neighbor as one of the leaders of the 30th of November Movement who was discussed by Peter Dale Scott in one of his earliest works on the subject. Except he or his editor spelled the name erroneously. And Winslow did his pitiful best to try to debunk the facts of my childhood experiences but failed miserably. Join the club. And Roy Hargraves confirmed the role of Homer S. Echevarria of the 30th of November Movement in both the Chicago, the Miami and the Dallas JFK plots. And Mary Ferrell once called "Big Daddy" Warbucks and "Little" Orphan Annie, the most fascinating manuscript she has seen in a long, long time. And even James Richards whose first reaction a few years ago was to minimize the roles of Harold B. Chait and Roy Hargraves but he has since turned full circle after he did some more digging. He is now saying that Roy Hargraves flew to Dallas after the failed Miami plot and took part in the Dallas festivities which would account for Hargraves inside knowledge on the subject regarding the perps. And he has indicated that the roles of Ulius Amoss, Harold Chait and Morris Schapiro at Boston Metals looms very large in the money laundering activities of the CIA. I would be interested in hearing about Dragoes references, accolades, and articles published by non-vanity publishers and his extensive recitation of innovative and relevant insights as well.

OK, I will bite. List the truly unique or original research done by James Douglass which has resulted in any brand new suspects or important new research into any unexplored groups or individuals. And perchance Drago would like to do the same for his "research." What do you feel are your original and unique contributions to the list of suspects and their affiliations and motivations and what are your Top Ten contributions which will survive the test of time and survive you as well?

Just curious.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

And by the way I also feel that both Drago and Evica always were and still are deserving of my extended pity for their basically unrecognized and totally unappreciated efforts and they have received it in droves from me as well.

Even Jim DiEugenio said that something over 100 pages could have been eliminated for lack of relevance and for not advancing any points or any themes. People will little note nor long remember the contributions of most of the armchair researchers on these forums, sorry to say. The state of the art of JFK Research has deteriorated into Group Think due to coercive attempts at the application of Social Opprobrium much worse than any Orwellian nightmare. And when these arguments, lacking any substance, degrade quickly into McCarthyesque or Gestapo styled tactics, then I believe my point has been made.

If your intention was to discourage Hank Albarelli, Jr. from posting here or from supporting any of my research with more positive comments or the with the addition of extensive related details, then you might just have succeeded. I hope he has not been cowed or coerced into not returning.

Unfortunately at Spartacus someone tried to engage him in an endless pissing contest over some picayune irrelevant detail and he politely declined to be baited into such a situation and has temporarily departed that scene perhaps permanently. I hope that does not happen here as well. Perhaps these efforts are intentional and maybe they are just symptomatic of "Defensive Territorial Aggression." In any event, it does more harm than good to the cause of solving ANY of the Civil Rights Cold Cases from the 1960's including the JFK, RFK and MLK cases. Wickliffe Draper, the KKK, the (White) Citizens Councils and Elmore Greaves were involved in ALL of these cases by the way. Every single one of them. And both Robert Emmett Johnson and Roy Hargraves and "Raoul from Montreal" were involved with at least two of them for sure: JFK and MLK. Bank on it.

We are all waiting with bated breath the postings about Gerry Hemming who was anything but a bit player. I don't think anyone could follow or appreciate the points about Hemming which were futilely attempted previously. Please elaborate.