Is the Assassination of JFK an "unsolved Civil Rights murder case from the 1960s"?

[Charles Drago]

What is really tragic is that Drago thinks that his primitive arm twisting Gestapo Tactics and McCarthyism Tactics: "Comply With My Theories and Post Only Supportive non-Argumentative Themes or Be Gone" will work on anyone.

I'm done with you, little man.

Not because I and others find your conclusions (as opposed to some of your research, which clearly is of value) to be fatally flawed by any number of pathologies, including your boundless narcissism -- which they are.

Not because your egomania is so advanced that it manifests in ravings worthy of the Little Corporal himself -- and in the process engenders laughter, revulsion, and pity in near-equal quantities -- which it is.

Not because my skin is so thin that it can be penetrated by your dull, predictable barbs -- which it surely isn't.

Rather, it's because you are a liar, as I demonstrated in my lengthy response to your post above in which you lied about an honored researcher's work and methods and otherwise mischaracterized -- knowingly -- his opinions of you and all you churn out. I write of the same honored researcher you once lionized when you thought you could convince anyone that he valued your mind and labors, and who now you choose to vilify because I've told the world just what he really thought of you.

Case in point:

And by the way I also feel that both Drago and Evica always were and still are deserving of my extended pity for their basically unrecognized and totally unappreciated efforts and they have received it in droves from me as well.

I will not attempt to hang an air freshener in the fetid corner in which you live and work by responding to your loaded questions. This isn't about my product or, in the final analysis, George Michael Evica's oeuvre.

Rather, my focus in these exchanges always has been on your work -- in particular the absurd, illogical, sometimes even frighteningly addled conclusions you draw that serve to all but invalidate the little true research you offer.

But it gets even better.

If your intention was to discourage Hank Albarelli, Jr. from posting here or from supporting any of my research with more positive comments or the with the addition of extensive related details, then you might just have succeeded. I hope he has not been cowed or coerced into not returning.

You poor, deranged cretin. It was I, as a co-founder of the Deep Politics Forum, who invited Mr. Albarelli to join this forum. It was I who started three separate threads for discussion of his work. And it is I who, along with many others, will continue to encourage him to post freely and often -- regardless of the degree to which I and other co-founders agree with his conclusions.

It is you who are attempting to manipulate him -- to force him to choose between your pathologies and this forum's opportunities to share and glean knowledge and pursue truth and justice.

I ask no one to make such a choice.

With each post you do the work of the enemy. You are exposed.

There can be no doubt but that your mental health has been altered. The only remaining question: Was the job done by committee?

Good luck in therapy.