27-02-2010, 09:17 PM
Charles Drago Wrote:Mark Stapleton Wrote:Charles, I would assume the sponsors came from within the ranks of those who own the tools. I don't think we'll ever know their names.
It was a Mossad hit though. Considering the upside for Israel, it was well worth the (minimal) risk. LBJ was especially grateful, and he showed his gratitude, many times over.
We'll agree to disagree.
Truth and justice will not be served absent the identification of Sponsors. So I must continue to try.
And to state with authority -- as opposed to conviction -- that the Kennedy murder "was a Mossad hit" is to misapprehend the nature of the Beast and to assign culpability in far too focused, and thus self-destructive, a manner.
Mossad techniques and/or operatives may have been utilized. And that's as far as I'm prepared to take it.
CD: Whenever this subject is posted on you make a point of stating your opinion of who you believe not to be sponsers. You hint that you also have an opinion of the identity of the sponsers, however it's a tease that never reaches a conclusion. It may be that many of us are simply not aquainted with the titles of the most secret groups which comprise our shadow governement, therefore we say "the CIA did it" when we are really meaning the black ops section of that agency together with whatever entity they are in fact fronting for.
I agree that all the usual suspects are in fact false sponsers.
But, in your opinion, who are the true killers?