08-12-2008, 09:52 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-12-2008, 10:10 PM by Charles Drago.)
Cliff Varnell Wrote:[H]ow could Harriman responsibly advise the new President that the Soviets were not involved only hours after the assassination unless he knew who actually did it?
Wrong, Cliff.
All Harriman had to know were his instructions.
And just who is the "who" in your "who did it"?
The mechanics?
The facilitators?
The sponsors?
Before one can hope to answer the "who did it" question, one must have in mind a working hypothesis for the plot's greater structure.
See my thread (as soon as I post it): "The JFK Plot: A Structural Model."
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene