13-01-2011, 09:00 PM
Jim,
You write: How does Morgan propose to explain this phony "plaque"? What does it mean to him that SOMEONE was going to the time and trouble to fabricate a fake plaque?
Asked and answered, as the lawyers say, but I'll summarize here. The Adams family was proud of the newspaper pic yet got the day/date both wrong. Why is this such a "reach" (so implausible) for you? Why reject it out-of-hand? I do not understand your intensity in trashing this interpretation.
And why would Conein or the CIA be afraid of a pic in the crowd? Those guys were full of hubris. Do you think any of them were afraid of Garrison later? Or the media, which they played like a Wurlitzer?
You write: How does Morgan propose to explain this phony "plaque"? What does it mean to him that SOMEONE was going to the time and trouble to fabricate a fake plaque?
Asked and answered, as the lawyers say, but I'll summarize here. The Adams family was proud of the newspaper pic yet got the day/date both wrong. Why is this such a "reach" (so implausible) for you? Why reject it out-of-hand? I do not understand your intensity in trashing this interpretation.
And why would Conein or the CIA be afraid of a pic in the crowd? Those guys were full of hubris. Do you think any of them were afraid of Garrison later? Or the media, which they played like a Wurlitzer?