27-01-2011, 01:12 AM
Jack White Wrote:One of the earliest books I read on "deep politics" was Prouty's
THE SECRET TEAM. If it is disinformation, I cannot discern it.
I believe that it establishes his credibility.
If Fletch was not a bona fide patriot exposing wrongdoing I am
badly mistaken, and if a "mole", he was very clever at the role.
I doubt that his many exposures are limited hangouts.
Charles, please point out to me the deficiencies of SECRET TEAM.
Jack
Jack,
It's not that I can point out "deficiencies" in Prouty's book or other offerings.
I'm simply suggesting that blanket acceptance of ANY source of deep political information -- even those that seem to check out over and over again -- is a bad idea.
I'll go this far: I literally trusted George Michael Evica with my life (detail irrelevant). You know, Jack, the mentor/student, even father/son relationship that we had. But I've never set him apart from critical evaluation of his material and message. I told him so. He respected me all the more for my stance.
The point of this thread is to inspire in all of its readers a renewed sense of wariness as we pursue our deep political studies.
Charles