28-01-2011, 10:11 PM
The CIA had ASSETS at all major publishers. Why should
you believe Simon and Shuster saying in a later edition
that the book is satire, when IF SO, it should have been
said in the original printing. Naive = gullible.
you believe Simon and Shuster saying in a later edition
that the book is satire, when IF SO, it should have been
said in the original printing. Naive = gullible.
Adrian Mack Wrote:Hey! Is this thing on?!?
Quote:In his book, Prouty goes in more detail, writing that the Group's existence "was so highly classified that there is no record, to this day, of who the men in the group were or with what sectors of the government or private life they were connected." Still, he claimed to have managed an exclusive interview with a "purported member of the Iron Mountain Special Study Group", who told Prouty he "believes that the group's mission was delineated by McNamara, William Bundy, and Dean Rusk." In 1996, Simon & Schuster reprinted the Report, with a new introduction, underlining that the book was a political satire.Link
This refers to Prouty's claims to have interviewed an unnamed member of a group that didn't exist.
I'm not trying to be an ass about it. I just want to know WTF?