Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
MPs Expenses affair - deep skullduggery afoot
#24
"Standurd! Read all abaht it! Standurd!"
[Image: NewspaperSeller.jpg]

Who tried to pinch what and why (well, you don't need to know why, it's obvious):

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/...s-rejected

Quote:MPs' expenses claims that were rejected and why
From an intern's lunch to office furniture, here are some of the rejected expenses claims

Share

Polly Curtis
guardian.co.uk, Thursday 3 February 2011 20.17 GMT
Article history
Ed Davey, the Lib Dem employment minister, was refused £115.64 for a phone bill after he failed to provide sufficient evidence. The correct documents have now been resubmitted, he said. "It is taking huge amounts of staff time which previously used to be directed at helping constituents. We are just trying to do our jobs. The whole system is getting in our way," he said.

Peter Luff, the Tory defence minister, had a £286.50 telephone bill rejected and £12.70 for "teas, coffee and biscuits" because he did not provide sufficient documentation. Another two claims for utility bills in his constituency office were rejected because Ipsa deemed them "not claimable". Luff said it was a problem with the documentation, which was part of a service charge, and that he had now resubmitted the evidence. "I am ringing Ipsa to complain about this. Ipsa shouldn't have put this in the public domain," he said.

Jack Straw, the former Labour home secretary, had £609 from his business rates claims withheld after providing insufficient evidence. He said in a statement: "The claim was withheld temporarily because of a misunderstanding of the documentation required. It was later repaid."

Jesse Norman, the Tory MP for Hereford and champion of "compassionate Conservatism", had the largest sum rejected £1,504.01 for office furniture. He claimed that Ipsa had subsequently admitted its mistake and paid the money in full. "We've been punctilious in obeying the rules. I haven't claimed any personal expenses, but by not checking the claims there is no case to publish this. They should have recognised the outcome rather than the process," he said.

Nicky Morgan, the Tory MP for Loughborough, had a £77 claim for a "big society" reception at the house of Commons rejected because she claimed it before the event took place. The receipt was later resubmitted and paid in full. She said: "Transparency is a good thing, but my concern is about how the explanations are conveyed. The flaw in the system is not that it's come up but that it doesn't say it was subsequently paid."

Harriet Harman,the deputy Labour leader, was refused £75 for the hire of a hall for a constituency surgery for the same reason. The claim was resubmitted and subsequently accepted.

Sir Malcolm Rifkind, the former chair of the standards and privileges committee in the Commons, had five claims totalling £171.80 rejected two taxis, two bills for newspapers and a travelcard for an intern. Four were technical errors and subsequently paid, and only one a £9.99 claim for photos for a pass to a Commonwealth conference was rejected on the grounds that the Foreign Office should have paid. "I am mildly irritated that Ipsa published unallowed claims without explaining why they were not allowed."

Ed Vaizey, the culture minister, was refused £4.75 to cover the cost of an intern's lunch. Vaizey said that the claim was permissible but that Ipsa had lost the receipt. "It's good for MPs because it reminds you what happens when you set up a quango. The public has to deal with things like the Criminal Records Bureau. This is a taste of our own medicine."

The employment minister, Maria Miller, was refused £13.20 for a congestion charge fee and dinner in the Commons. She could not be contacted.

****

Check the expenses database yourself HERE
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14
Reply


Messages In This Thread
MPs Expenses affair - deep skullduggery afoot - by David Guyatt - 04-02-2011, 12:32 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  COVID-19 IS A 'STRUCTURAL DEEP EVENT' Lauren Johnson 8 11,490 30-06-2020, 06:01 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  Cambridge Analytica - A British Deep State Tool David Guyatt 8 26,260 27-03-2018, 06:41 PM
Last Post: James Lateer
  The Democratic State v. The Deep State - Great Paper! Peter Lemkin 11 29,858 06-10-2015, 06:38 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Hong Kong's "Umbrella Revolution" is a US affair David Guyatt 1 2,588 14-10-2014, 11:58 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  The Ebola Outbreak as a Deep Political Event Lauren Johnson 8 7,521 09-10-2014, 03:06 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  Web of Lies - The Iran Contra Affair David Guyatt 0 2,574 15-02-2014, 10:25 AM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  The Profumo affair - MI6 murdered Stephen Ward David Guyatt 0 3,994 03-12-2013, 10:39 AM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  New York Bikers A Deep Op? Albert Doyle 8 8,104 13-10-2013, 04:47 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  Question: How many unfortunate acts does it take cross over in the deep political? Lauren Johnson 0 2,566 12-03-2012, 06:34 PM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  Catholic priest's involvement in bombing covered up by British deep state Jan Klimkowski 16 11,802 13-12-2010, 08:24 PM
Last Post: Jan Klimkowski

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)