25-02-2011, 01:23 AM
Charles Drago Wrote:Come on, Albert, the Vinson story is pure drama -- a fictive construct designed to confuse.
We can't afford to believe in mistakes. Not at that level.
WHY would the killers of a president hesitate to kill a witness to the conspiracy?
Play it out. The comedy of errors is as you describe it. WHY, then, wouldn't "they" have just whacked Vinson?
The biggest flaw in Vinson's story is no one seeing a big C-54 lumber down in Dallas by the Trinity River. This stands out to me and I don't know what to make of it? Did Vinson land at Red Bird but lied in order not to break a military oath? One that they could tag him for.
Did the story tellers make-up an intercom announcement that said 12:29 instead of 12:30 to make it sound unique and therefore real?
I would guess this one is real because it was witnessed right away by his wife. But also because the FBI harassment started a few months after the assassination. It doesn't stand to reason that this would be a "construct" because the timing is right for Vinson telling his wife "That was the guy I saw on the flight" while watching Oswald on TV. Were the FBI in on the construct too so early in the game? For what reason? They were witnessed by people in the town.
You would have to explain why Vinson would go through all these documented moves in the months after the assassination? Why would he take a bus from Roswell if he hitched a flight to Denver? The documented behavior and happenings occurring to Vinson right after the assassination show something was happening to him. In my mind this is too soon after the assassination for spooks to be constructing red-herrings involving doubles.
In the end, we have to ask what purpose putting a "construct" out there that proved a second Oswald would have? Especially one that showed he was associated with CIA?
I thought about it and if this story is true the only reason Vinson is alive is because he kept his mouth shut in the time between the flight and the FBI interviews.