14-04-2011, 02:57 PM
I found it very concerning to see Richard Gage implying and/or stating things such as, "The NYC seismographs are confusing, I've never studied them", or "I know that 1,400+ mangled cars cannot be explained [by thermite], I don't know what can explain that", or "I don't want to ask questions that will raise more questions, I [only] want to ask questions that will motivate people to ask for a new investigation", or "it's up to you [public] to do something with this evidence and act on it, because I am working 80 hours per week managing this organization and no attorney has stepped up yet." (I wonder if Richard Gage forgot about James Gourley, the legal attorney, supporter of AE911Truth and the Journal of 9/11 Studies, and the Executive Director of the International Center for 9/11 Studies?)
Most of this happened during Part 2 when I asked him questions one-on-one at the very end of the Q&A session...
Most of this happened during Part 2 when I asked him questions one-on-one at the very end of the Q&A session...
9/11 Challenge: Explain the Evidence http://pookzta.blogspot.com