22-04-2011, 04:07 AM
Kyle,
I agree that a building hitting the ground in chunks as opposed to one large mass could result in smaller spikes on a seismograph, but this would also be reflected by a longer seismic wave since the pieces would not all hit the ground at the same time (if they did, it would be similar to the whole building hitting the ground at once).
The seismic data is one minor piece of thousands, so please study all the evidence you can and make up your own mind. There are hundreds of pieces of data that Richard Gage does not discuss, which is very bothersome because these hundreds of pieces of data cannot be explained by thermite or explosives of any kind.
I am glad you are looking into more into this topic.
Best wishes,
-Abe
I agree that a building hitting the ground in chunks as opposed to one large mass could result in smaller spikes on a seismograph, but this would also be reflected by a longer seismic wave since the pieces would not all hit the ground at the same time (if they did, it would be similar to the whole building hitting the ground at once).
The seismic data is one minor piece of thousands, so please study all the evidence you can and make up your own mind. There are hundreds of pieces of data that Richard Gage does not discuss, which is very bothersome because these hundreds of pieces of data cannot be explained by thermite or explosives of any kind.
I am glad you are looking into more into this topic.
Best wishes,
-Abe
9/11 Challenge: Explain the Evidence http://pookzta.blogspot.com