02-05-2011, 07:13 PM
The problem with this book is that Farrell uses the Torbitt document as a legitimate and serious source to reach his conclusions. I wonder why he would do a thing like that, when he would have known that his work will be discredited by association with that document. He puts too much emphasis on the LBJ thing. Then he adds an aura of mystery with masonry, a subject that fascinates a lot of English writers, a culture of masons, night templars and the holly grail.
Should i dare to say that Torbitt+LBJ+masonry=disinformation to discredit truthful parts of his book?
Should i dare to say that Torbitt+LBJ+masonry=disinformation to discredit truthful parts of his book?