Banishment: My Evidence to the jury.

[Seamus Coogan]

I'd agree that her information [or position] on the JFK assassination is ill-informed to way-out-there and not worth the electrons written with, but I don't think a person should be banned unless one can be pretty sure it is not naiveté; but rather knowingly disinformation - otherwise I'd suggest to just ignore [by the way, is the ignore function activated on this forum?].....I haven't followed her posts enough to have made a decision, other than my first statement. Some are just new and having been led down the wrong garden path...others [who are dangerous] are here and elsewhere to cause trouble, distension, internal fights through division, purposely spreading disinformation [as opposed to naively repeating it]. Just would like this Forum not to make some mistakes of other Forums.....hock: My two cents. Usually those of the former category eventually realize they are in the wrong place and remove themselves. The latter group never leave, until pushed out...as they are here to cause friction and worse.

Well said.............................what, I'm the prosecutor here Pete!!!!!!!!!!! Sheeesh I'd get murdered if this was the court room lol! I'm not taking the post toooooooo seriously but I've just seen some sly stuff being pulled. I do think it's quite clear that Betty appears to be taking the piss. But hey she might be naive and having fun (at the expense of those reading her stuff) I'll change the title it does appear a bit like I'm spitting the dummy like a certain well known researcher who inhabits these parts!