Banishment: My Evidence to the jury.

[Seamus Coogan]

I'd agree that her information [or position] on the JFK assassination is ill-informed to way-out-there and not worth the electrons written with, but I don't think a person should be banned unless one can be pretty sure it is not naiveté; but rather knowingly disinformation - otherwise I'd suggest to just ignore [by the way, is the ignore function activated on this forum?].....I haven't followed her posts enough to have made a decision, other than my first statement. Some are just new and having been led down the wrong garden path...others [who are dangerous] are here and elsewhere to cause trouble, distension, internal fights through division, purposely spreading disinformation [as opposed to naively repeating it]. Just would like this Forum not to make some mistakes of other Forums.....hock: My two cents. Usually those of the former category eventually realize they are in the wrong place and remove themselves. The latter group never leave, until pushed out...as they are here to cause friction and worse.

Well said.............................what, I'm the prosecutor here Pete!!!!!!!!!!! Sheeesh I'd get murdered if this was the court room lol! I'm not taking the post toooooooo seriously but I've just seen some sly stuff being pulled. I do think it's quite clear that Betty appears to be taking the piss. But hey she might be naive and having fun (at the expense of those reading her stuff) I'll change the title it does appear a bit like I'm spitting the dummy like a certain well known researcher who inhabits these parts!

I think your post's intentions were noble; I only know I was booted off of the EF [as a Mod] for being too radical, too honest, and believing in too many alternate views that were anathema to Herr Walker SS and even Joseph Stalinesque Simkin - once my friend. So, I'm sensitive to being 'banned' for the wrong reasons.

I do NOT claim to know if Betty is a neophyte, naive, ill-informed; or a false entity of the intelligence and propaganda ministry [or their willing accomplice, but real]. I only ask that such matters be taken slowly and wisely. I have not said so before, but I say so now - a few have been ejected from this forum who deserved it; a few others I felt it was premature to make an intelligent and informed decision about. My guess is she'd be very happy and welcome at the EF!...whoever / whatever she is or knows.

Peter in all fairness it's not my place too comment on your situation vis a vis Simkin and co. I don't know much about your situation and it sounds harsh. I mean there's some extremely alternate views on the EF so too single you out is bizarre. JF has said some pretty outrageous stuff and said it extremely loudly lol. Yet he's allowed around. I've never seen you approach that level of intensity and he's still on here (as he has every right to be) thus it's just all odd about the imbalance of tolerance I mean look at how much a cretin J Raymond Caroll is what does he contribute? Jack Shit (an interesting guy related to both him and Todd Vaughan).

EF has some great people on it. Its got a crap load of potential that should it adopt the modding policy DPF has it would be a lot less blood thirsty place. It's funny, we we're discussing Betty's suitability to the EF in another thread. Hell like I said they tolerate Phelps and a collection of horrors whom wouldn't get a sniff on here or Lancer. I also agree it's very easy to jump on someone new or out of sorts lol. I mean my debut on here was freaking hilarious I recall CD telling me to 'Fuck off' lol. I quickly apologised and then I fled for Mexico.