08-06-2011, 01:08 AM
I have heard back from Doug, i am only posting what i think pertains to the Chaney, information from him....re the photo, i will be back...b..
Bernice:
I just read Chaney died April 19, 1976. This was during my first year of law school ( when he died I was only 23 years of age) when I did not know much about the assassination except that a friend of mine had done a paper in college in 1974 but he never talked with anyone himself in doing the paper and I doubt he ever mentioned Chaney. My real interest in the assassination began in 1978 when my interest was stimulated when I realized the HSCA was going to conclude there was another gunman. My interest was also stimulated by "Best Evidence" in 1981. All of this is explained in my book. I know nothing about this Betty. Maybe she talked with someone else. Does she explain how anyone was "legally stopped" from talking with anyone? I am not aware of anyone ever being "legally stopped" from trying to talk with a witness. It is kind of strange. The only way I could think of someone being "legally stopped" would be if a subpoena was issued for a witness and a court quashed the subpoena as was happening to Jim Garrison and some of his witnesses. Before Chaney's death I was only a student. I was 10 years old when Kennedy was killed.
Bernice, feel free to use this or anything from my last e-mail in your response or anything I have said or written. I never hide anything. You can quote anything or everything I have written in my e-mails or even use these e-mails to you verbatim. If I am ever wrong I have no problem admitting to such. I NEVER SPOKE WITH ANY WITNESS UNTIL I TALKED WITH WHITAKER IN 1993. I knew very little about Chaney until 1998 when Gary Mack shared some film footage of Chaney with me in Dallas.
Bernice:
I just read Chaney died April 19, 1976. This was during my first year of law school ( when he died I was only 23 years of age) when I did not know much about the assassination except that a friend of mine had done a paper in college in 1974 but he never talked with anyone himself in doing the paper and I doubt he ever mentioned Chaney. My real interest in the assassination began in 1978 when my interest was stimulated when I realized the HSCA was going to conclude there was another gunman. My interest was also stimulated by "Best Evidence" in 1981. All of this is explained in my book. I know nothing about this Betty. Maybe she talked with someone else. Does she explain how anyone was "legally stopped" from talking with anyone? I am not aware of anyone ever being "legally stopped" from trying to talk with a witness. It is kind of strange. The only way I could think of someone being "legally stopped" would be if a subpoena was issued for a witness and a court quashed the subpoena as was happening to Jim Garrison and some of his witnesses. Before Chaney's death I was only a student. I was 10 years old when Kennedy was killed.
Bernice, feel free to use this or anything from my last e-mail in your response or anything I have said or written. I never hide anything. You can quote anything or everything I have written in my e-mails or even use these e-mails to you verbatim. If I am ever wrong I have no problem admitting to such. I NEVER SPOKE WITH ANY WITNESS UNTIL I TALKED WITH WHITAKER IN 1993. I knew very little about Chaney until 1998 when Gary Mack shared some film footage of Chaney with me in Dallas.