01-12-2011, 08:13 PM
Albert,
I was not endorsing that idea, but explaining that those who studied it--Richard Sprague, Robert Cutler, and now Alan Salerian--are not "wing-nuts", as Josiah describes them, but serious students of the case who were operating in ignorance of Malcolm Perry's description of a bullet entry wound in JFK's throat, of the through-and-through hole in the windshield, of the tiny shrapnel wounds in his face, which appear to have come from small pieces of glass when the bullet passes through it nor of Bob Livingston's explanation that cerebellum could not have been extruding from the back of his head unless the tentorium, a tough membrane that covers it, previously had been severed. Once we know those things, the wound has been explained and we do not need to search for an exotic weapon of the kind the CIA actually had in 1963.
Jim
I was not endorsing that idea, but explaining that those who studied it--Richard Sprague, Robert Cutler, and now Alan Salerian--are not "wing-nuts", as Josiah describes them, but serious students of the case who were operating in ignorance of Malcolm Perry's description of a bullet entry wound in JFK's throat, of the through-and-through hole in the windshield, of the tiny shrapnel wounds in his face, which appear to have come from small pieces of glass when the bullet passes through it nor of Bob Livingston's explanation that cerebellum could not have been extruding from the back of his head unless the tentorium, a tough membrane that covers it, previously had been severed. Once we know those things, the wound has been explained and we do not need to search for an exotic weapon of the kind the CIA actually had in 1963.
Jim
Albert Doyle Wrote:I don't mean to slight or challenge Fetzer's praiseworthy efforts, but my instincts tell me it would be difficult to aim an umbrella flechette weapon under those circumstances - or hide the dart afterwards.