The Danger Of The Fetzer Assassination School

[Albert Doyle]

We are talking about basic INcompetency- YOURS! If Black Hole Man's face is being shaded by the lintel, why are his arms so brightly lite up and also his shirt? We are talking about extremes here. His arms and shirt are dazzling bright; his face is a black hole. Yet, they are essentially aligned with each other. In fact, in a human being with normal posture, the face is anterior (forward ) of his torso. That's because the head leads and the body follows. Why is his face behind the shade line if his torso is not?

Because he has his arms extended slightly away from his head in order to block the glaring sun. There's a basic thing here you refuse to accept. Raised Arms Man has backed-up deliberately to the lintel shade line in order to use it to block the glare of the sun. As a person who was seeking shade would do, he backed-up and found the shade line with his eyes and stopped. This then left his arms still in the sun, adding additional shading, as was his purpose. In my opinion, it is almost comical to seek-out mysterious CIA forgery explanations for this while not seeing the obvious simple explanation. Also, your argument fails immediately if you don't see that Black Tie Man and Raised Arms Man are both standing further back into the entryway than Lovelady, who has pulled forward and tilted in order to crane himself around the corner column as is clearly seen in the picture. It is plainly evident that Lovelady is leaning forward and to his left in order to achieve this manuever. Because of this he has dropped his left shoulder into a vertical position. If you don't see that you are simply missing what is there and plainly visible.



[size=12]

And clearly, Black Tie Man is farther back than Black Hole Man. Yet, we can at least see part of Black Tie Man's face. (not that he's real)

Do you comprehend that you were previously arguing, with the same assurance, that Black Tie Man was in front of Lovelady? Now you are saying he is further back. He can't be further back unless he is behind Lovelady. Again, we have squarely arrived at the issue of basic competency. Furthermore, you were just saying they were all on the same plane. Now you are saying Black Tie Man is further back. Also, when you first posted this video you were saying there were two strange white stripes in front of "Doorman". When I explained the "white stripes" were actually the two sides of Black Tie Man's shirt separated by his tie you then went and changed your videos in response. We then coined the term Black Tie Man.

And I totally dispute and deny your claim of Black Hole Man being a foot or two or more further back than Doorman. I implore someone else to come forward to render an opinion about that. And if so, how is the light reaching him at all? If he's that much further back, when clearly Doorman is largely under the lintel himself, then why isn't Black Hole Man completely in the dark?

Raised Arms Man is at the shade line. These are not difficult concepts to understand (unless of course you are trying to force a forgery theory against any and everything else). This is the basic point: The reason Raised Arms Man is in the shade and "Doorman" isn't is because Raised Arms Man is further back. The way we know he is further back is because he's shaded by the lintel shade line which is established in reality as being further back. How do we know the lintel shade line is further back? 1) because we could still show today that it is further back by going there and observing it on November 22nd, and 2) "Doorman" isn't shaded by it. You refuse to grasp that the shade-line itself (which could be proven any November 22nd) is the guiding rule here and determinative. The reason "Doorman" isn't shaded by it is because he's forward of it - which is proof in itself.

The difference in terms of the plane of location between Black Hole Man's head and his arms, with his arms being around his head, would not be great enough to account for such an extreme difference in illumination: bright illumination vs. total darkness. No way. Those parts of his body are too close to each other. So, don't conveniently make assumptions, such as that his arms are "just" forward of the shade line while is head is "just" behind it. You'd like to think so, wouldn't you? And you're entirely willing to just glibly declare it, aren't you? How irritating. Competence? What nerve.

You've committed the basic mistake of assuming Raised Arms Man has his hands on his head. The reason his arms are raised in the first place is because he is shading his eyes from the sun. You, Dr Cinque, are the one making the assumptions here. This would be borne-out by science by going to the entryway and repeating the photo on November 22nd. If you did so you would find the shade and light to be perfectly explained by the sun angle off the lintel. The difference between light and dark areas would be further explained by the film, lens, and blow-up issues I already spoke of.

In regard to the "craning" I suggest to any reader that you get a ruler and run through the vertical axis of Doorman's body and see if his head seems to be risely straight up squarely. Then, turn the ruler sideways and run it across his shoulders. You will find that he is twisted slightly, but the forward side is his left side, the side that is allegedly in front of BT Man. There is no valid reason why we should not be seeing that shoulder. There is no valid reason why the white stripe effect of BT Man's shirt should be covering his shoulder up. The point of Doorman's shoulder should be visible, plain as day.

If we eliminate the specious speculation, the simple explanation is the photo clearly shows Lovelady leaning forward and craning in order to peer around the entryway corner column. There's a very valid reason why the shoulder isn't upright and in its normal position. It is because he's dropped it in the act of peering around the column. He's leaning. You can see it plainly if you do close-up analysis of the photo.

And again: Who is Black Tie Man? Who is Black Tie Man? Who is Black Tie Man? Who is Black Tie Man? Cough it up! And if you don't know, why don't you know?

An unnamed person standing behind Lovelady in the doorway. This does not prove the ridiculous forgeries you are suggesting. The fact you think it does kind of proves something to me.

Finally, again, this is all a sideline. Apparently, you don't want to talk about my central thesis, which has nothing whatsoever to do with Black Hole Man. My thesis concerns Doorman and his clothes. Apparently, you are afraid to talk about that. You want to keep talking about light and optics like you're Galileo. Well, Doorman isn't in the shade. He's in the light of day, buddy boy. And there's a lot to see.

I've seen your blurry, fuzzy blow-up of "Doorman's" shirt. I honestly didn't see the firm 'proof' you claim. Remember, with your own claim of Altgens' photo being flashed around the world, when did CIA place Lovelady's plaid pattern onto this shirt? How did they figure-out who would be in conflict etc in such a short period? Sorry, but if you are going to present such a claim you have to be able to deal in the area of optical science, film properties, shade features, etc.

By the way, were Oswald's buttons ripped-off in the scuffle during his arrest?





[/SIZE]