The Danger Of The Fetzer Assassination School

[Albert Doyle]

I never said that Black Tie Man was in front of Doorman. You are misquoting me. My stated position has always been that Doorman and BT Man are in an impossible relationship. ONE OF THEM SHOULD HAVE A VISIBLE SHOULDER. That is, the one in front should have a visible shoulder. But neither has a visible shoulder. Therefore, BT Man is neither in front of nor behind Doorman. They are fused together like Siamese twins.

This is silly. Credulous. First off, you very much did claim, vigorously, that Black Tie Man was in front of "Doorman" and was placed there by forgery in order to conceal the obviousness of Oswald's lapel that you credit yourself for detecting. I went back to cut and paste the quotes but I see you edited your You-Tube comments section and removed them. I think this speaks not only of your competency but your character. What's even worse about this is if you view your videos you can see in video #3 that Doorman's shoulder is completely visible and distinguishable from Black Tie Man's front. It's plain as day if you have even the most basic of photo analysis skills. Black Tie Man's shoulder isn't visible because "Doorman's" shoulder is in front of it and blocking it. "They are fused together like Siamese twins" is absurd, as was your claim Black Tie Man was in front of "Doorman" (as your revisement of that proves). After deleting his claim that Black Tie Man was in front of "Doorman" because he realized I was correct Dr Cinque called me "CIA scum" and blocked me from his comments section.

So, you are saying that Black Hole Man backed up to the lintel shade line? But, he really didn't get behind it because his shirt is so illuminated. One's torso is not forward of one's face. If anything, it's the opposite.

Ah, ya. The anatomical arrangement is question here is the head being above the torso. This pushes the head up into the shade while the torso, being lower than the head, stays in the sun. Not difficult to understand.

So, that leaves the arms. I knew you were going to have to get back to relying on those raised arms. But, the problem is that his arms are way too far out to the sides.

His arms and hands are right where they would be to shade his eyes. That's why he has them raised.

They are not really blocking the light to his face- at least not enough to produce a black hole effect. Again, compare to the woman beneath him. And her arm is more in front of her face than either of his arms are. There is no way that his arms, as positioned, could completely block all light to reaching his face.

Which only proves the lintel shade is blocking his face. The woman is not in the doorway so she's not comparable. (She's not behind the shade line which in itself proves the shade line is responsible for the obscuring)

We should see SOMETHING there. Not a black hole.

Repeated numerous times: The film and camera won't pick up subtle contrasts at that blow-up level and distance.

How can his shading be from the lintel when it's only his face that is shaded?

Because the shade line is from the neck up (This isn't difficult stuff to comprehend).

And since we can't see his face at all, we really don't know where his hands are. But generally, when people raise their hands like that, they rest their hands against their head, and that's because otherwise, they would have to hold them up. They get heavy! I think it's a very reasonable assumption that his hands are resting against his forehead, probably at the hairline.

Nope. People sometimes push their hands away from their face and up towards the light source because it creates a better viewing field. Don't speculate, just look at what the picture shows.

Doorman is not twisted that much at all. It's a very slight twist of the left side forward. But, we should see the POINT of his shoulder. We don't. It is not visible, plainly or otherwise.

You don't see "Doorman's" right arm, however he is almost certainly holding on to something in the corner there to allow himself to drop his left shoulder as much as he does. All perfectly explained by his need to peer around the column. You can see it plain as day with competent photo analysis.

And by the way: you should realize that lots of people don't recognize Black Tie Man as a man, and that includes other lone-nutters like yourself, and other conspiracy theorists like me.

Your description of me as a "Lone Nutter" is about as accurate as your claims.