04-01-2012, 06:07 PM
Mr. Doyle,
I would like to delve deeper into your position because I'm trying to make sense of it. Again, one is hardpressed to explain why an innocent man would lie to the police and claim to be outside when he was really on the 2nd floor. I dare say that only guilty people lie to the police. Innocent people have nothing to hide. And you clearly believe that Oswald was innocent. So why would he lie? You really need to give an explanation because that behavior was so contrary to his best interest at the time. What is your compelling reason for believing that Oswald remained on the 2nd floor during the motorcade? And I don't consider Carolyn having reported seeing him there beforehand to be a compelling reason. It may be a reason, but it is not a compelling one.
And what could he possibly have been doing there on the 2nd floor? Eating? Drinking? Practicing self-gratification? Excuse me for saying that but I'm racking my brain here trying to figure it out. People don't just sit in a room and dwiddle their thumbs. If they're there, they're there for a reason, and they're doing something. So, if you have the notion that he was there, and that he remained there during the parade, you have to give a reason for his being there.
Some have suggested that he remained inside to eat. But, he could have taken his food outside, as others did. One such person was Billy Lovelady. He said that he went outside and sat down on a step to eat his lunch. But, if Oswald really did prefer to remain inside to eat, why didn't he just say so?
"I wasn't interested in watching the motorcade, and I preferred to remain inside on the 2nd floor to eat my lunch."
Was that so hard? Was there any reason why he could not and would not have said that, had it been the truth?
Please respond to this, as I am trying to understand the basis of your position. Thank you. Ralph Cinque
I would like to delve deeper into your position because I'm trying to make sense of it. Again, one is hardpressed to explain why an innocent man would lie to the police and claim to be outside when he was really on the 2nd floor. I dare say that only guilty people lie to the police. Innocent people have nothing to hide. And you clearly believe that Oswald was innocent. So why would he lie? You really need to give an explanation because that behavior was so contrary to his best interest at the time. What is your compelling reason for believing that Oswald remained on the 2nd floor during the motorcade? And I don't consider Carolyn having reported seeing him there beforehand to be a compelling reason. It may be a reason, but it is not a compelling one.
And what could he possibly have been doing there on the 2nd floor? Eating? Drinking? Practicing self-gratification? Excuse me for saying that but I'm racking my brain here trying to figure it out. People don't just sit in a room and dwiddle their thumbs. If they're there, they're there for a reason, and they're doing something. So, if you have the notion that he was there, and that he remained there during the parade, you have to give a reason for his being there.
Some have suggested that he remained inside to eat. But, he could have taken his food outside, as others did. One such person was Billy Lovelady. He said that he went outside and sat down on a step to eat his lunch. But, if Oswald really did prefer to remain inside to eat, why didn't he just say so?
"I wasn't interested in watching the motorcade, and I preferred to remain inside on the 2nd floor to eat my lunch."
Was that so hard? Was there any reason why he could not and would not have said that, had it been the truth?
Please respond to this, as I am trying to understand the basis of your position. Thank you. Ralph Cinque