11-01-2012, 08:33 PM
Albert,
While one of us may have been "finished off", that one is not me:
(1) Lovelady was wearing either a checkered shirt or a striped shirt.
(2) Doorway Man was obviously not wearing a striped shirt.
(3) Doorway Man was less-obviously not wearing the checkered
shirt either, because its features are not the same as Doorway Man's.
(4) Therefore, Doorway Man is not wearing Lovelady's shirt.
(5) The very features that show that Doorway Man's shirt is not one
of Lovelady's (checkered or striped) shirts show that they are the
same features found on the VERY DISTINCTIVE shirt Oswald was
wearing.
(6) The face of the man to the right/front was obfuscated as was
his shirt. There must have been good reasons to go take the pains
and run the risks of changing the Altgens photo.
(7) Given the shirt evidence, by far the most--and even the only--
plausible explanation for these defects in the photograph is that
(a) the moved the face onto Oswald's figure and (b) obfuscated
both the face and the shirt so the game would not be given away.
Unless Albert Doyle can cope with this argument, he has no basis
for claiming that it is WE who are unwilling to admit we are wrong
when both logic and the evidence are on our side. Q.E.D.
While one of us may have been "finished off", that one is not me:
(1) Lovelady was wearing either a checkered shirt or a striped shirt.
(2) Doorway Man was obviously not wearing a striped shirt.
(3) Doorway Man was less-obviously not wearing the checkered
shirt either, because its features are not the same as Doorway Man's.
(4) Therefore, Doorway Man is not wearing Lovelady's shirt.
(5) The very features that show that Doorway Man's shirt is not one
of Lovelady's (checkered or striped) shirts show that they are the
same features found on the VERY DISTINCTIVE shirt Oswald was
wearing.
(6) The face of the man to the right/front was obfuscated as was
his shirt. There must have been good reasons to go take the pains
and run the risks of changing the Altgens photo.
(7) Given the shirt evidence, by far the most--and even the only--
plausible explanation for these defects in the photograph is that
(a) the moved the face onto Oswald's figure and (b) obfuscated
both the face and the shirt so the game would not be given away.
Unless Albert Doyle can cope with this argument, he has no basis
for claiming that it is WE who are unwilling to admit we are wrong
when both logic and the evidence are on our side. Q.E.D.
Albert Doyle Wrote:In respect to Dawn (and common sense) both Dr Fetzer and Dr Cinque were just very quickly finished-off in the thread on Lancer. I'm satisfied anyone of normal cognitive skills would see that and rest my case.