15-05-2012, 04:11 AM
I'm surprised that no one takes the kill shot on Cinque of simply saying the still image he is showing of Lovelady is simply a frame from the same movie that isn't altered in aspect ratio. If the video frames Cinque is showing go from 1:04 to 1:08 seconds on the You-Tube video the still shot he is showing is from around 1:02 seconds of the same film. I generally think David Josephs offers weak stuff, but in this case he was the only one who seems to get it. The fade-in and fade-out from the You-Tube clip shows that it was taken from a longer clip of footage. That longer clip contains the still image of Lovelady Cinque is claiming is evidence of forgery. The clown has even wagered eight thousand dollars for anyone who can show the source of this still image.
I'm not sure if Cinque is an operator. If he is then Fetzer is too. Right now I think he's simply a clown who has managed to get his 15 minutes of fame on the major sites. The cure for his madness is to force him to answer the points I'm making and, if he refuses to do so, then take action. He's being allowed to get away with the murder of saying that the clock showing 2 o'clock "is good enough" when the difference of a few seconds makes all the difference. I'm surprised some of the better minds on EF let him get away with that.
I'm not sure if Cinque is an operator. If he is then Fetzer is too. Right now I think he's simply a clown who has managed to get his 15 minutes of fame on the major sites. The cure for his madness is to force him to answer the points I'm making and, if he refuses to do so, then take action. He's being allowed to get away with the murder of saying that the clock showing 2 o'clock "is good enough" when the difference of a few seconds makes all the difference. I'm surprised some of the better minds on EF let him get away with that.