19-05-2012, 02:37 PM
In my short experience of both Lemkin and EF the former clearly has the credibility here. EF seems to go out of its way to cater to the Cinque garbage cart. Typical of authoritarian sites it uses site rules and conduct as an excuse to censor. At some point gentlemen of knowledge have to be able to call an ass like Cinque an ass. To filter this out in order to protect codes of conduct is to limit that which is most free about free speech. There's no peer in review if jackasses like Cinque are given equal value by means of forced rules. Or if those who bear the obvious right of truth are forced into contrived obsequiousness to fools.