The Danger Of The Fetzer Assassination School

[Greg Burnham]

Albert, I merely corrected your error regarding a simple definition. You could have just said: "Thanks, I stand corrected."

A tad arrogant there Greg considering you ignored my response showing you why you were wrong.


.

What the hell about this don't you get?


[size=12]You made a blunder. You misidentified Cinque's error as a logical fallacy called: The Straw Man.

The blunder is of no consequence. What you actually identified is Cinque's intellectual dishonesty.

At least call it what it is.

As for your other contentions regarding the issue...good for you. POST THEM YOURSELF.

I have other fucking fish to fry.

:banghead:

You'd be well advised to hop out of my pan. Pronto--[/SIZE]

I already explained to you that Cinque used the 'had lunch' issue to avoid answering the real issue in question. That is, the reason why Fritz wrote about the Baker encounter well before describing Oswald being out front with Shelley. I already explained that Cinque knew that Oswald hadn't eaten lunch after the Baker encounter because there wasn't enough time. The reason he shifted the argument to this impossible lunch time was because he was trying to avoid the main point of Fritz mentioning the Baker encounter long before Oswald's going out to the front steps. When you make one argument in order to avoid another that is, by definition, a strawman. Sorry, but I believe I'm correct on this.


And now James DiEugenio, of all people, is agreeing with Cinque's delusions. Unfortunately, James is wrong. Lovelady did not lose any weight in the Groden picture. He's as thin as he was in the FBI picture Cinque describes as "scrawny".

Albert,

You are incorrect. But, like I said, I have bigger fish to fry.