22-05-2012, 01:30 PM
Don Jeffries Wrote:Thanks for the thoughtful response, Charles. As you remember, I was always supportive of you in the past, too. Whatever caused you to leave the EF (I thought you left of your own volition), I was sorry to see you go.
You're quite welcome. Let's move forward on the basis of our mutual recognition that we're on the same side.
Don Jeffries Wrote:You may have done impressive work analyzing the writings of Colby, but again what purpose is ultimately served by that? Let's say you uncover undeniable proof that Colby is some kind of collective psyop; even if you got rid of him/them, wouldn't others arise? I just don't think this is a productive area of research. How could you ever conclusively prove someone was a disinfo agent? We know that numerous '60s "counterculture" icons like Timothy Leary and Gloria Steinem were associated with the CIA. It's been acknowledged, and the few Americans who are aware of that don't really seem to care.
What "purpose is ultimately served by" exposing "Colby" and "his" comrades?
Oh, I don't know ... Exposing the truth? Educating the ignorant that we are at war and are considered targets? Teaching all who care and all who should care but don't about the enemy's strategies and tactics? Convincing the Simkin-esque cannon fodder that in allowing the illusion of a level playing field for the agents provocateur's lies and our truth is tantamount to our defeat?
For starters.