14-08-2012, 12:45 AM
Robin Unger Wrote:Quote:
this is simply a case of an innocent "Rago's" "photo interpretation skills [being] sadly lacking.
Charles i didn't say he was innocent.
I said he was of no consequence, as in ( he doesn't warrant the attention that is being paid to him )
his GIANT EGO will just lap that up.
I'm sure that he loves the fact that people on this forum are discussing him.
Quote:
and good men and women are wasting bandwidth on a fool's errand.
Yes Charles.
On that we do agree.
I know what you wrote, Robin. I'm not sure you do. Because if "Rago" is not innocent, then by definition "he" is of consequence.
Get it?
The critical difference, Robin, is that here at DPF we're exploiting the inherent weakness of disinformation operations -- their weakness to exposure by equal or superior opponents willing to counterattack.
EF is entertaining "Rago" and his ilk.
DPF is exposing and exploiting "Rago" and his ilk.
There is a world of difference, if only you could see it.