16-09-2012, 04:23 AM
I don't think that quite answers the question. Also, I haven't bought anything of Janney's. I haven't even read the book. I think the arguments have been clear that theoretically there is a lot a leeway still involved that doesn't necessarily prove it one way or another. In fact, if we were to follow the strict rule of hard evidence demanded here, Crump's gun was never found.
I guess the point is that if it is Mitchell he should be questioned. If it isn't then Mitchell remains a mystery.
As Charles noted, disproving Janney, his methodology, and his sources does not equate to Mary Meyer not being assassinated by intel, or perhaps Janney and Damore's bad material being used for deep purposes of disinformation or other.
I guess the point is that if it is Mitchell he should be questioned. If it isn't then Mitchell remains a mystery.
As Charles noted, disproving Janney, his methodology, and his sources does not equate to Mary Meyer not being assassinated by intel, or perhaps Janney and Damore's bad material being used for deep purposes of disinformation or other.