22-09-2012, 12:44 AM
But ALbert, it was Damore and Janney who made the claim that Mitchell disappeared into the ozone, and that he also lived at a CIA safehouse. They said they could not track him down after his appearance at the trial.
But what this shows is that either they were too trusting of their CIA sources, and/or they did not do very much work trying to track him down.
Let us put it this way: Janney comes from a well off family which has ties to the Rockefellers. Now, if with all those resources, he could not find out that there appears to be a guy who does fit the Mitchell profile, then the obvious question is: Why could Scully do that just using Google, yet Janney and Damore could not do that in 25 years with much more time and money?
I personally will not look the other way on this point. It is a very salient issue which tells us much about the agenda these two had in the making of this book. If they could not find this personage who resembles Mitchell, then either they 1.) They did not try very hard, or 2.) They did not try at all, and trusted some CIA sources who appear to have led them down into a cul de sac.
This is a serious criticism. Just as serious as the dubious "Vivian" that it appears Dovey Roundtree and Crump ahem, doodled up in order to manufacture an alibi for the defendant.
I really look askance at this kind of shoddy work in this day and age.
But what this shows is that either they were too trusting of their CIA sources, and/or they did not do very much work trying to track him down.
Let us put it this way: Janney comes from a well off family which has ties to the Rockefellers. Now, if with all those resources, he could not find out that there appears to be a guy who does fit the Mitchell profile, then the obvious question is: Why could Scully do that just using Google, yet Janney and Damore could not do that in 25 years with much more time and money?
I personally will not look the other way on this point. It is a very salient issue which tells us much about the agenda these two had in the making of this book. If they could not find this personage who resembles Mitchell, then either they 1.) They did not try very hard, or 2.) They did not try at all, and trusted some CIA sources who appear to have led them down into a cul de sac.
This is a serious criticism. Just as serious as the dubious "Vivian" that it appears Dovey Roundtree and Crump ahem, doodled up in order to manufacture an alibi for the defendant.
I really look askance at this kind of shoddy work in this day and age.