23-09-2012, 01:13 AM
Albert:
Please, did you not read my review? Did you not read Janney's book?
The divorce was not for those reasons. And I backed that up. What Janney tries to do is build a case out of essentially nothing in order to advance that idea. For instance, he uses anonymous sources to say Mary did not like Allen Dulles. Why would that be necessary today?
Please explain to me how Burleigh veriified Angleton had tapped Mary's phone?
Because Burleigh also reported that Mary never questioned the WR. So what was the point?
As per Popper, i would argue that Janney's ideas were already found false many years ago. It was in 1997 that I addressed the tesimony of people like Leary and Truitt. And three years ago when I discussed Douglass.
Please, did you not read my review? Did you not read Janney's book?
The divorce was not for those reasons. And I backed that up. What Janney tries to do is build a case out of essentially nothing in order to advance that idea. For instance, he uses anonymous sources to say Mary did not like Allen Dulles. Why would that be necessary today?
Please explain to me how Burleigh veriified Angleton had tapped Mary's phone?
Because Burleigh also reported that Mary never questioned the WR. So what was the point?
As per Popper, i would argue that Janney's ideas were already found false many years ago. It was in 1997 that I addressed the tesimony of people like Leary and Truitt. And three years ago when I discussed Douglass.