23-09-2012, 05:07 AM
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:My God Charles, you are beginning to sound like RCD over at Spartacus.
This is not a court room.
We are dealing with what we know today outside of the court room.
To try and brush aside Crump's life of crime afterwards, which was pretty shocking, is ahistorical.
Of course it isn't a courtroom. If it were, you long ago would have been held in contempt for your repeated efforts to introduce inadmissible "Crump's life of crime afterwards" details as evidence of his guilt in the MPM murder.
It is just as likely that Crump was driven to criminal behavior as a consequence of the emotional impacts of his arrest and trial as it is that such behavior was common prior to MPM's murder.
Put it another way: Your hypothesis is not falsifiable. Therefore it is rejected out of hand.
If you know of inculpatory evidence not available to the Crump jury, then by all means present it.
If not, give up your wholly unconvincing, inevitably futile efforts to overturn a valid verdict with nothing more than transparent arguments from authority, and address my original point:
The falsification of Peter Janney's MPM assassination hypothesis would not resolve the assassination/common crime conundrum at the core of this unsolved murder.
If you require additional simplification thereof, don't hesitate to ask
And if, as you claim, I am "beginning to sound like" a certain contributor to the EF Swamp, then your voice on the MPM/Crump issue long ago became indistinguishable from the contemporary voice of Jim Fetzer.