23-09-2012, 03:12 PM
Charles Drago Wrote:It's a lovely, autumnal Sunday morning here in New England, and my mood is as light and cool as the breeze.
Permit me, then, to simplify further my original challenge:
The falsification of Peter Janney's MPM assassination hypothesis would not resolve the assassination/common crime conundrum at the core of this unsolved murder.
Let's assume, for the sake of argument (as opposed to quarrel), that we discover an e-mail from Janney to a literary agent in which the former declares that, since a novel and screenplay based on his wholly fictional account of an MPM hit scenario have been rejected by publishers and studios respectively, he now will use said tall tale as the centerpiece of what he will claim to be a non-fiction account of the murder. (*)
In other words, let's assume that Janney's MPM hit scenario indeed has been falsified.
Would you agree that said falsification tells us nothing of value about how and why MPM was killed?
________________________________________
(*) I must note for the record that my hypothetical itself is pure fiction and should not be read as anything else.
Again, yes. I think the problem Jim is having is that he cannot get past the Crump -did- it notion that he seems to have had for years.
When I asked him repeatedly over at EF who was calling Roundtree late at night every single time she visited the crime scene he ignored my question. Because it does not fit with his long held view that the black guy did it.
Enjoy the day CD. It's cooled nicely here too.
Dawn