9/11 Weekend - New hypothesis to Explain 9/11 - Part I

[Peter Lemkin]

Those are all very short excerpts. See the lower part of each to go to the full version and best to watch the YouTube version. He has some interesting ideas....some I agree with, some I reserve judgment on, but need looking into, others I have to say I reject at this point given what I know and better explanations for the same results. That said, his and all other honest alternative ideas of how 9/11 was carried out need to be considered, studied, matched against the evidence and accepted, rejected or put in the 'maybe' file. I think his best work is on the missile strike on the Pentagon - and that it might have been a nuclear one from the Kursk. Well worth watching and considering all nearly four hours though! Like Judy Wood, he has a somewhat unique, but coherent analysis of what happened. Each of these also further tear down various aspects of the official fiction of what happened as impossible. I don't consider him a disinformation agent, but do not see evidence of how a nuclear device would or could have caused the collapse as we saw it happen. I reserve judgment on the planes / no planes - as there seem to be evidence for and against both at this point in time [a problem in itself - proving that NO real official investigation was done; rather only a cover-up.