Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
9/11 Weekend - New hypothesis to Explain 9/11 - Part I
#41
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:Charles... correct., but the made WHAT happen is the nuance here. I have been arguing that that there is no evidence of CD and destruction of the towers by INTENT. I am guessing that the intent was to have jets slam into the WTC... stage another 2 *plane events* at the pentagon and PA and blame it all on the *A rabs*... but the actual destruction of the WTC was not only not planned but not expected!

The collapses of the towers were critical to the success of the operation. Absent a deep understanding of the powers of symbol and myth and storytelling, one cannot understand deep politics at any meaningful level.


Jeffrey Orling Wrote:But that was only a speed bump in their plans. First they had to cover up why / how the wtc towers came down (they weren't supposed to).


Hold on. If the towers' collapses were not part of the plan and, by inference, happened as natural consequences of the impacts, why the need to fabricate any false "narritive" [sic]? Your argument for the need to cover up the negligence of powerful people and institutions -- mere Facilitators -- does not hold water within the broader context of a deep political operation. The Sponsors of the "attack" would not have jeopardized post-operational security just to protect Facilitators' interests.

And do tell: WHY exactly weren't the towers supposed to fall?


Jeffrey Orling Wrote:Then they stood up a fake 911 truth movement will all manner of passionate misguided followers harping on craxy theories about uncle Sam blowing up the WTC with a range of hi tech exotic weaponry in a conspiracy involving a well coordinated and unreheased cast of thousands... witness, first repsonders, new people... the Truman show made real (is that an oxymoron?)

This is a convoluted argument for pointless convolution.


Jeffrey Orling Wrote:were itching for a new Pearl Harbor... and they helped it happen and then got on with their agenda while idiot patriots screamed for blood.... and the others cowered scared to get on a plane.

So passive Sponsors wrung their hands and prayed patiently for another entity to launch the sort of plot that the Sponsors could piggy-back?

Whatever you're smoking, order me a carton.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
9/11 Weekend - New hypothesis to Explain 9/11 - Part I - by Charles Drago - 15-10-2012, 09:13 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  What A Coincidence......Boeing aircraft part found three blocks from WTC - yesterday! Peter Lemkin 5 6,600 30-04-2013, 09:38 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  World Trade Center Buildings (and Others?) Pre-Rigged for Controlled Demolition: A Hypothesis Charles Drago 42 22,126 26-03-2013, 07:07 PM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  How Demolition Charges Were Placed in WTC 1 AND 2: A Hypothesis Charles Drago 37 22,482 17-08-2011, 06:26 AM
Last Post: James Lewis
  WTC Employee Talks About Pre-911 Power Outages All Weekend! Peter Lemkin 1 3,722 16-11-2010, 10:25 PM
Last Post: Myra Bronstein
  A Little Known Coincidence [or Part of Conspiracy] Peter Lemkin 0 3,294 25-09-2010, 12:09 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Jack Abramoff released from prison early ... for his part in the 9/11 cover up? Ed Jewett 2 4,038 10-06-2010, 07:09 AM
Last Post: Carsten Wiethoff
  Good 12 Part Video Lecture On 911 Nanothermite! Peter Lemkin 4 4,423 20-08-2009, 05:49 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Wheels Within Wheels - And a Bit-Part Walk-On! Peter Lemkin 1 3,253 23-04-2009, 08:33 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Anthrax Attacks Were Part & Parcel Of 911 Peter Lemkin 4 4,416 24-03-2009, 07:03 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  SHADOWPLAY: Part 1, 9/11 PUPPETMASTERS Paul Rigby 0 3,984 17-10-2008, 11:37 AM
Last Post: Paul Rigby

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)