16-10-2012, 06:12 PM
Charles,
Let's not act so condescending and dismissive. I use the term MIHOP meaning intentionally placed devices with all three towers to destroy them.
Albert is correct that a LIHOP is tantamount to MIHOP because the outcome is more or less the same. The difference is that I contend that there is no hard evidence of CD and the towers seemed to have collapsed without CD devices... but from a sequence beginning with planes hitting them.
Could your sponsor friends and their mechanics/operative have known that hitting two towers would knock 3 towers down? I seriously doubt it. So... one might analyze as follows:
WTC 7 not a CD -> likely Twins not a CD either
WTC 7 is a CD -> twins likely CD also
Why would they CD 7 and not 1 & 2? Who would believe that? answer no one. Two plane slam into the towers and what do you know WTC 7 collapses...
Charles I may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer... but I wasn't born yesterday either.
In a sense understanding (my MIHOP) view wtc 7 is key. If it's not a CD then it looks like the entire destruction was not CD and was a result of the plane damage and this may or may not have been intended.. complete destruction of the complex. My guess is that it wasn't and it went out of control so to speak. But they got the same results ultimately and simply had to cover their asses a bit more with deeper lies.
You don't like this theory? Tough nuggies. It's a free country! :dancingman: lighten up dude!
Let's not act so condescending and dismissive. I use the term MIHOP meaning intentionally placed devices with all three towers to destroy them.
Albert is correct that a LIHOP is tantamount to MIHOP because the outcome is more or less the same. The difference is that I contend that there is no hard evidence of CD and the towers seemed to have collapsed without CD devices... but from a sequence beginning with planes hitting them.
Could your sponsor friends and their mechanics/operative have known that hitting two towers would knock 3 towers down? I seriously doubt it. So... one might analyze as follows:
WTC 7 not a CD -> likely Twins not a CD either
WTC 7 is a CD -> twins likely CD also
Why would they CD 7 and not 1 & 2? Who would believe that? answer no one. Two plane slam into the towers and what do you know WTC 7 collapses...
Charles I may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer... but I wasn't born yesterday either.
In a sense understanding (my MIHOP) view wtc 7 is key. If it's not a CD then it looks like the entire destruction was not CD and was a result of the plane damage and this may or may not have been intended.. complete destruction of the complex. My guess is that it wasn't and it went out of control so to speak. But they got the same results ultimately and simply had to cover their asses a bit more with deeper lies.
You don't like this theory? Tough nuggies. It's a free country! :dancingman: lighten up dude!