9/11 Weekend - New hypothesis to Explain 9/11 - Part I

[Lauren Johnson]

Lauren,

I am not communicating with anyone from AE911T. And frankly AE911T doesn't communicated with the 1500 who signed their petition.

I am not interested in publishing a paper. I am an architect and don't have the time and frankly the technical expertise in physics and engineering. Participating on 9-11 discussions is the limit of what I am going to do for the foreseeable future. I am not going down the rabbit hole of becoming a 9-11 personality.. selling books, make lectures and being quoted by *followers*. Not interested in winning wars of ideas or beliefs or toppling those who have set themselves up as experts. But Fetzer IS one annoying character who should listen more than speak.. or write.

I did the research to satisfy my own curiosity and learned a lot along the way. I am neither a leader nor a follower. I am an independent person who is exercising my right to express myself on the various forums which are available to the general public. I post on forums about sailing, ballet, politics and obviously 9-11.

My thesis is no more speculative and likely less so than any other out there. It is based on observed mappings of building movements and applying my limited knowledge of structure, physics and science... which is a helluva lot more grounded than your 9-11 beliefs I imagine.

I was just reminding you that belittled the 1500 number of AE911T compared to the numbers they could have had in another post. I was asking a rhetorical question: Where are you minions? OK, you are just one person. I still don't see a lot of people supporting you.

And the videos I posted are the single most troubling set of facts that you cannot give an adequate answer. You just walk away. Explosions? What explosions? Oh, those. Sequential? Naw. Witnesses told the buildings would be brought down? Fuggetaboutit. Witnesses describing the explosions as Thum. Thum. Thum. Thum. Just like in the Ashley Banfield piece? I didn't hear anything. There were also the explosions before the 5:20 pm collapse as reported by the deceased Barry Jennings.

I think your analysis actually helps to explain why so few explosions were necessary. They had only a few beams to blow out. Of course, there were the explosions seen as squibs during the collapse. And there were earlier explosions as reportedAfter that, it's all the control of the flow of news.