9/11 Weekend - New hypothesis to Explain 9/11 - Part I

[Albert Doyle]

Before I get banned, I'm starting to lean towards a controlled demolition for WTC-7. It seems obvious from these witness statements that authorities were openly saying they were going to pull the building. Obviously pulling the building in this context means bringing it down deliberately. I've seen enough government action like the Kennedy Assassination and TWA 800 to know they openly lie in contempt to the American public and this is probably another example where they could compound the effect of 9-11 by bringing a damaged building down at a convenient time. The devil is in the details but it looks like they brought it down intentionally. How they did that is beyond me in a building that was on fire.


Still though, I wish people would be honest and give me a straight answer as to why the clear area in Banfield's video fills in with smoke before the booms they show?

Anyone?

I'm just calling for objectivity here.