21-10-2012, 05:57 PM
(This post was last modified: 21-10-2012, 06:40 PM by Albert Doyle.)
A video showing the precise timing of the East Penthouse collapse vs the oscilloscope booms would really tell a lot at this point.
OK, I'm getting a better grasp of the deception here from the Banfield video. If you go to that video you'll see the narrator shows you a video of the standing building in order to synchronize the sequence of events. That narrator is wholly dishonest because he's not informing you that he's showing the building 6 seconds after the collapse of the East Penthouse. So while the narrator is using this deception to suggest the booms were timed with the collapse he is deliberating omitting visual evidence that the booms were actually timed with the East Penthouse core collapse. This is evidence of deliberate deception by the makers of the video. As is their omitting the unevenly spaced booms that occur in increasing progression after the evenly spaced ones. If the maker of the video was honest he would show the video of the standing building including the East Penthouse collapse.
OK, I'm getting a better grasp of the deception here from the Banfield video. If you go to that video you'll see the narrator shows you a video of the standing building in order to synchronize the sequence of events. That narrator is wholly dishonest because he's not informing you that he's showing the building 6 seconds after the collapse of the East Penthouse. So while the narrator is using this deception to suggest the booms were timed with the collapse he is deliberating omitting visual evidence that the booms were actually timed with the East Penthouse core collapse. This is evidence of deliberate deception by the makers of the video. As is their omitting the unevenly spaced booms that occur in increasing progression after the evenly spaced ones. If the maker of the video was honest he would show the video of the standing building including the East Penthouse collapse.