9/11 Weekend - New hypothesis to Explain 9/11 - Part I

[Lauren Johnson]

Edit: I have to withdraw the clear air challenge because further on in the video, if you have the sharp eye I was calling for, you will notice the Banfield video shows the standing building with the clear air area already filled-in with black smoke. So, in trying to challenge this I now realize this is proof of the opposite and proves the booms came BEFORE the collapse. Actually in perfect timing for the department store charge delay.

This unfortunately is still not resolved because the low volume booms could be the trusses failing internally which was a prolonged event according to what is known about the collapse. So, it is possible the clear air filling-in was because of the inner portion containing one of the penthouses falling a few seconds before the main building. This series of low volume booms could very well be the sequential failure and floor collapse of that inner section collapsing with the Penthouse. Its low volume nature could actually be evidence of this event.

Yet this doesn't exclude a controlled demolition either.

I agree with you and JO that there are signs of collapse before the Oscilloscop Like Explosions (OLE). I was watching a collection of WTC7 collapse videos, one of which zooms on north bottom floor. Search for Xenomorph911WTC and 911: WTC7 building collapse compilation. Go to about 5:00 mark for the closeup. Definitely increased activity before the OLE.

I rule out spontaneous collapse based on the sequential nature of the explosions. The loud explosions are corroborated by the Banfield involutary response. That building was "pulled" has been confirmed by more than one witness. One close up witness described the sequence (I will find it later). Smoke and flame at the bottom of WTC7 does not at all exclude CD.