21-10-2012, 09:27 PM
The only data we have is the movement of the building and perhaps the appearance of lots of dust or a flare out before the visible collapse. Any sounds have to be related to wither explosions or parts of the building hit each other or the ground... or the sub station. Floor slabs which no long have support and collapse will make quite the loud noise when the hit something.
We know the end result.. a completely shattered building with the slabs crushed to dust. You can't have that sort of mechanical destruction without noise or heat as a by product. One really needs to have that data to solve the mystery.
A sequence of sounds can be the collapse of floors crashing just as it could be that of explosives going off in sequence. I tend not to goi with the sequence of explosions because it makes little sense. If you are going to blow it why not just set them off at once at the trusses and then the building would collapse down? It hardly makes sense to take donw one floor at a time... and break many columns to do it all simultaneously repeated several times?
Remember the roof line movement had no resistance for 100 feet of drop. The only explanation that makes sense to me is the 6&7th floor structure was destroyed and it topped off at 104' above the ground the precise distance for a 2.25 free fall. Therefore the sounds were more likely colliding building parts than the exposives that set them free.
And of course what accounts in the CD theory for the creation of all the dust? Was THAT from explosives or was it (as I suggest) from floors crushing each other... 43 of them to be exact?
We know the end result.. a completely shattered building with the slabs crushed to dust. You can't have that sort of mechanical destruction without noise or heat as a by product. One really needs to have that data to solve the mystery.
A sequence of sounds can be the collapse of floors crashing just as it could be that of explosives going off in sequence. I tend not to goi with the sequence of explosions because it makes little sense. If you are going to blow it why not just set them off at once at the trusses and then the building would collapse down? It hardly makes sense to take donw one floor at a time... and break many columns to do it all simultaneously repeated several times?
Remember the roof line movement had no resistance for 100 feet of drop. The only explanation that makes sense to me is the 6&7th floor structure was destroyed and it topped off at 104' above the ground the precise distance for a 2.25 free fall. Therefore the sounds were more likely colliding building parts than the exposives that set them free.
And of course what accounts in the CD theory for the creation of all the dust? Was THAT from explosives or was it (as I suggest) from floors crushing each other... 43 of them to be exact?