31-10-2012, 02:59 PM
Lauren Johnson Wrote:Quote:My best analysis: Obama is given the razor-thin victory so as to put to rest the suspicions that a close presidential election in which the son of the Republican candidate owns an electronic voting machine firm will be stolen for the GOP.
Thus is preserved and protected the fraud option for future use in an election in which one of the candidates represents true change.
How about this one?
The fear and hatred of Obama is huge amongst certain groups. No, really. A razor thin election could serve to stir the pot in a big way. Season with a "revelation" of vote rigging on the part of a Democrat or two. Suddenly, It's "Obama stole the election." A razor thin victory could end up serving all kinds of agendas.
Not bad. Not bad at all.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene